consumer forums consumerforums Total Bank Charges Returned : £17,500,569 to 10384 people.

Bank Charges Refunds Survey | 'Buddy' System | Get an email address | Registration Problems | FAQ
The Consumer Forums  

CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right

These sales also help us to keep helping YOU and ensure this site will remain free to use!

Small Claims Kit-- Small Claims Court Guide
**New Edition**
Consumer Action Group envelope labels Last Will & Testament Kit Fight a Motoring Ticket
 
Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here


UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - click here: ConsumerWiki

Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide
An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.
£17.10 + £1.50 (P&P)

Lawpack - Small Claims Kit
Contains everything you need to sue your bank (or anyone else) including sample forms, instruction manual, templates, and an entire set of court forms in PDF format on CD Rom.
£10.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Last Will and Testament Kit
Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.
£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Fight a Motoring Ticket Kit
All the templates and documents that you need to challenge your speeding ticket, parking fine - with advice from one of the UK’s leading motor offence solicitors
£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Download and Install Browsealoud

Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Bank Action Group - against unlawful bank charges
> Lloyds Bank

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
eBay buyer?
Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Ebay buyer?
ConsumerSniper
Free unlimited bids and eBay tools
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
 

Notices

Lloyds Bank Meet other Lloyds Bank customers who have also been faced with excessive unfair bank charges. Exchange encouragement and information about getting your bank charges refunded

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 27th April 2007, 16:44   #1 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
We need funds
Please donate something

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Mr R J Priest


Ref: SCH1

TSB






SORT CODEx-xx-xx






ACCOUNT NUMBERxxxxx






SCHEDULE OF CLAIM FOR CHARGES





PERIOD: 20/09/2001 TO 25/04/2007






In Respect of: Amount(a) Date Incurred
Days since offence interestautolinker.com autolinking image 8% APR(b)

20/09/2001 chg o/draft usage fee £20.00 20/09/2001
2045 £0.00

20/09/2001 fee account charge £4.00 20/09/2001
2045 £0.00

19/10/2001 fee account charge £4.00 19/10/2001
2016 £0.00

20/11/2001 chg o/draft usage fee £25.00 20/11/2001
1984 £0.00

20/11/2001 fee account charge £4.00 20/11/2001
1984 £0.00

20/12/2001 chg unpaid d/d £27.50 20/12/2001
1954 £0.00

20/12/2001 chg unpaid s/o £27.50 20/12/2001
1954 £0.00

20/12/2001 fee account charge £4.00 20/12/2001
1954 £0.00

18/01/2002 chg o/draft usage fee £25.00 18/01/2002
1925 £0.00

18/01/2002 fee account charge £4.00 18/01/2002
1925 £0.00

20/02/2002 fee account charge £4.00 20/02/2002
1892 £0.00

20/03/2002 fee account charge £4.00 20/03/2002
1864 £0.00

19/04/2002 fee account charge £4.00 19/04/2002
1834 £0.00

20/05/2002 fee account charge £4.00 20/05/2002
1803 £0.00

20/06/2002 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/06/2002
1772 £0.00

20/06/2002 fee account charge £4.00 20/06/2002
1772 £0.00

19/07/2002 fee account charge £4.00 19/07/2002
1743 £0.00

20/08/2002 fee account charge £5.00 20/08/2002
1711 £0.00

20/09/2002 fee account charge £5.00 20/09/2002
1680 £0.00

18/10/2002 fee account charge £5.00 20/10/2002
1650 £0.00

20/11/2002 fee account charge £5.00 20/11/2002
1619 £0.00

20/12/2002 chg unpaid s/o £30.00 20/12/2002
1589 £0.00

20/01/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/01/2003
1558 £0.00

20/03/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/03/2003
1499 £0.00

20/03/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/03/2003
1499 £0.00

17/04/2003 fee account charge £5.00 17/04/2003
1471 £0.00

20/05/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/05/2003
1438 £0.00

20/06/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/06/2003
1407 £0.00

20/06/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/06/2003
1407 £0.00

18/07/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 18/07/2003
1379 £0.00

18/07/2003 fee account charge £5.00 18/07/2003
1379 £0.00

20/08/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/08/2003
1346 £0.00

20/08/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/08/2003
1346 £0.00

19/09/2003 fee account charge £5.00 19/09/2003
1316 £0.00

20/10/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/10/2003
1285 £0.00

20/10/2003 chg unpaid d/d £60.00 20/10/2003
1285 £0.00

20/10/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/10/2003
1285 £0.00

20/11/2003 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/11/2003
1254 £0.00

20/11/2003 chg unpaid s/o £30.00 20/11/2003
1254 £0.00

20/11/2003 fee account charge £5.00 20/11/2003
1254 £0.00

19/12/2003 fee account charge £5.00 19/12/2003
1225 £0.00

20/01/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/01/2004
1193 £0.00

20/02/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/02/2004
1162 £0.00

19/03/2004 fee account charge £5.00 19/03/2004
1134 £0.00

20/04/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/04/2004
1102 £0.00

20/05/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/05/2004
1072 £0.00

18/06/2004 fee account charge £5.00 18/06/2004
1043 £0.00

20/07/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/07/2004
1011 £0.00

20/08/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/08/2004
980 £0.00

20/09/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/09/2004
949 £0.00

20/10/2004 chg unpaid d/d £30.00 20/10/2004
919 £0.00

20/10/2004 chg unpaid s/o £30.00 20/10/2004
919 £0.00

20/10/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/10/2004
919 £0.00

19/11/2004 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 19/11/2004
889 £0.00

19/11/2004 fee account charge £5.00 19/11/2004
889 £0.00

20/12/2004 fee account charge £5.00 20/12/2004
858 £0.00

20/01/2005 chg o/draft excess fee £20.00 20/01/2005
827 £0.00

20/01/2005 fee account charge £5.00 20/01/2005
827 £0.00

18/02/2005 fee account charge £5.00 18/02/2005
798 £0.00

01/03/2005 chg unpaid s/o £32.00 01/03/2005
787 £0.00

01/08/2006 fee account charge £10.00 01/08/2006
269 £0.00

01/09/2006 fee account charge £10.00 01/09/2006
238 £0.00

02/10/2006 fee account charge £10.00 02/10/2006
207 £0.00

01/11/2006 fee account charge £10.00 01/11/2006
177 £0.00

01/12/2006 chg o/draft excess fee £30.00 01/12/2006
147 £0.00

01/12/2006 fee account charge £15.00 01/12/2006
147 £0.00

02/01/2007 chg o/draft excess fee £30.00 02/01/2007
115 £0.00

02/01/2007 fee account charge £15.00 02/01/2007
115 £0.00

01/02/2007 fee account charge £15.00 01/02/2007
85 £0.00

01/03/2007 fee account charge £15.00 01/03/2007
57 £0.00

02/04/2007 fee account charge £15.00 02/04/2007
25 £0.00


















total (a)


total (b)


£881.00


£0.00






(a+b) total




£881.00
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2007, 16:50   #2 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
Have we helped you? Please help us by making a donation

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

sorry cut and paste is a bit naff - im sorting this claim for my father inlaw - i only have a couple of questions.

he was sent an itinerary of charges od interestautolinker.com autolinking image and different fees - in the format they send out is all of this including od interest accountable into the schedual for reimbursment. I have not enetered interest as i dont know if this is the amount of interest for the fees and not whole monies.

also the acount fee is only £4.00 to start rising to £15.00 nearer 2007
£4.00 seems just - can they argue this with the £4.00/£5.00 fees?

these questions are for those who have taken tsb to court or more knowledgable people than me

cheers steve
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2007, 17:59   #3 (permalink)
Classic Account Holder
 
nicsussex's Avatar
 
eBay user? Find misspellings and zero-bid items

Cagger since : Mar 2006
Posts: 2,590
nicsussex Informativenicsussex Informativenicsussex Informative
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkrage View Post
can they argue this with the £4.00/£5.00 fees?
I would love it if they did!
nicsussex is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2007, 19:50   #4 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

take that as a no then thnx for the info
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 14:23   #5 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

oops been busy with my hsbc claim and forgot about this one lol

lbaautolinker.com autolinking image sent 30/4 best put in the n1 form and start the claim since they sent a rather silly letter spouting some stuff about credit charges which im not cliaming so onwards and upwards maybe a month late but im sure my father inlaw wont mind.

will try to get n1 form in this week.

1 question tho - for garyh or other mods on lloyds are the poc's different compared with hsbc's and if they are could someone pm me their pocs aimed at lloyds

thx in advance
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 14:27   #6 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
We need funds
Please donate something

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

oh sorry not submitting via mcol going to use n1 so i can get more poc's on it so we dont get into the claim to vague defence criteria.
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 15:47   #7 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

are these poc's ok
1. The Claimant has held Account (xx-xx-xx) xxxxxx since approximately 1976 with the Defendant.

2. During the period in which the Accounts have been/was operating the Defendant debited 71 charges (average of £12.40) to the Accounts in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

3. A complete list of the charges applied to these accounts are attached.

4. The Claimant contends that:

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.
b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £2042.50;
b) Court costs;
c) interestautolinker.com autolinking image pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 at 8% APR from date of each charge to date of the claim, total £112.43, Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £0.19p per day OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act (1982).
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:10   #8 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Is your bank avoiding its debts
Data disclosure poll

Cagger since : Mar 2007
Posts: 160
Champnos Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

You cannot claim the bank chargesautolinker.com autolinking image of £4 and £5, even if they increased to £15 it would probably be as the account was upgraded. These are not penalty charges but a fee fr the operating of that specific account. I pay £7 a month and get free AA cover etc.

Hope im not too late!
Champnos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:17   #9 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

hi - could someone else comment on this maybe a mod i thought all charges of which have not been agreed could be claimed back and since this account does not charge a usage fee for the account itself then this od/fee is a charge and can be claimed back.

will pm a mod to have a read.
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:20   #10 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Mar 2007
Posts: 160
Champnos Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Hmm it looks like a account fee, a usage fee in other terms. A fee for the account.

If not then i would have said £4 or £5 would be a reasonable penalty and thus should not be claimed.

Hopefully someone can clarify this for you, will keep an eye on this!
Champnos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:30   #11 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money?
Start your County Court claim NOW!!!

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

well lets say they charge £5.00 but actually it only costs them £2.50 in adminautolinker.com autolinking image costs they are still gaining 100% profit sowhy cant i claim it back
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:36   #12 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

I know what your saying but unfortunately the OFT do not back this up, they state there must be some profit made to cover overheads heres a snipplet of what the OFT reported

"In April ‘06, the Office of Fair Trading opined that credit card charges were too high and should be reduced to £12, which most plastic providers have since done. It’s undoubtedly a positive step, though many may still think £12 is too high; yet it adds weight to the case for reclaiming charges as it makes all prior charges look too expensive."
Champnos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:41   #13 (permalink)
Platinum Account Holder
 
livelylad's Avatar
 
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money?
Start your County Court claim NOW!!!

Cagger since : Jun 2006
I am in: Devon
Posts: 9,558
livelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritative
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Champnos View Post
I know what your saying but unfortunately the OFT do not back this up, they state there must be some profit made to cover overheads heres a snipplet of what the OFT reported

"In April ‘06, the Office of Fair Trading opined that credit card charges were too high and should be reduced to £12, which most plastic providers have since done. It’s undoubtedly a positive step, though many may still think £12 is too high; yet it adds weight to the case for reclaiming charges as it makes all prior charges look too expensive."
Actually the OFT are not important. Its law that is important, its unlawful to make a profit on a breach of contract. Therfore if the actual cost is £2.50 and they charge you £5 it is unenforceable.
livelylad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:47   #14 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
Posts: 160
Champnos Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Unfortunately you wont be able to back that up. Each bank will have different overheads which need be taken account of when making charges in relation to these penalties. These also appear to be fees for the account.

Ive read a lot of documents and sites and its quite apparent that you should not attempt to claim amounts if they are deemed to be acceptable, acceptable is less than £12. The OFT report is also used in the court bundle i believe thus would be detramentle to this case
Champnos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 16:50   #15 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
Protect your signature with SignGuard

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

so onwards and upwards lively lad - n1 will be filed this week with these charges as they stand.

thanks for taking the time to stop by
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 17:00   #16 (permalink)
Platinum Account Holder
 
livelylad's Avatar
I am in: Devon
Posts: 9,558
livelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritativelivelylad Authoritative
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Champnos View Post
Unfortunately you wont be able to back that up. Each bank will have different overheads which need be taken account of when making charges in relation to these penalties. These also appear to be fees for the account.

Ive read a lot of documents and sites and its quite apparent that you should not attempt to claim amounts if they are deemed to be acceptable, acceptable is less than £12. The OFT report is also used in the court bundle i believe thus would be detramentle to this case
Ok, account fees can not be reclaimed as you say for example RBS royalties fee £6. However to state that a charge below £12 is acceptable is wrong. You can only be charged the amount that is required to administer the breach of contract. Thats the law. The OFT have no powers to make law in this country.
livelylad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 17:03   #17 (permalink)
Basic Account Holder
 
darkrage's Avatar
 
eBay user? Find misspellings and zero-bid items

Cagger since : Jan 2007
Posts: 290
darkrage Novitiate
Default Re: Priest Vs Lloyds tsb

as far as im aware this account has no *fee* to operate it but i will clarify this with the account holder - i think they have just worded the charges well so it gives doubt.

actually looking at the schedule of charges - non of them are a fee for operating an account they are just fee's for breach into o/d so i can claim these
darkrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter The Consumer Forums Replies Last Post
RichardM v Lloyds c/cards. Lloyds playing silly buggers over SAR RichardM Lloyds Bank 8 26th March 2008 22:40
Claim against lloyds with lloyds loan still active macca1301 Lloyds Bank 15 17th August 2007 11:51
Lloyds V Angi77777 - ****WON!**** Angi77777 LloydsTsb Successes 55 7th July 2007 23:36
zeus v lloyds - won (for all those sick of lloyds dragging their feet) zeusspandex LloydsTsb Successes 43 23rd June 2007 20:40




Browsealoud
Video Tour


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

vBulletin autolinks by AutoLinker.com
Linux consultancy and web development