GOT A COURT DATE? Important, please read......

[olliebollie]

Pen
P.S which is thread one?? Probably obvious but my brain is frazzled!!!
Cheers

[lampard08]

Hello, I have just received a an order from the court that the case is to be transfered to the mercantile and commercial registry at the Royal Courts of Justice what does this mean for my claim?

[GaryH]

Leeds I take it?

First of all you need to start a thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...newthread&f=11

Post the order up in full and someone should be along to help you

[but6le]

Originally Posted by GaryH

Lloyds specific Witness statement for inclusion in court bundles. Amend to suit;

© Reclaim the Right Ltd.

Gary, For the prelom hearig, do I need Mr Ortons letter?
Thanks for all the help to everone.

[GaryH]

No, not for a prelim - you don't need a bundle.

There are a couple of bits and pieces you should take, see this thread (top bit) -
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ate-guide.html

[photoman]

Gary
Sorry to post on this thread, but couldn't think how else to get your attention?
Firstly, did you get my PM about the info I have, I think it could be quite telling?
Secondly, my claim is now in full swing. Recieved acknowledgement of service and intent to defend.
Guess it's now wait for the defence and possibly an AQ.
All due within next 14 days.
Do I post info regards Litigation in Process to someone ?
Regards
PM

[Hass]

Hi there

I am using the Witness Statement in my court hearing. Is it important that it is placed in a particular order in the bundle? If so, where should it go? I have the same problem with the McNamara transcript and, when I receive it, the Martin Orton letter.

Thanks!

[Pen]

Olli Thread one is #1 the very first post on this thread by Gary, it has links to all you need for the bundel
Pen

[lampard08]

Hi Gary,

Thankyou for all your advice. However just to let you know I never ended up filing an amendment as i have been so busy at work etc but was going to get round to it when as i said to you i received an order that my case had been read through and transfered to the mercantile and commercial registry at the Royal Courts of Justice. I don't know if this was Leeds or not as it does not say.

[lampard08]

In a further development i have received correspendence from LLoyds solicitors which will bring the dispute to a close pretty soon.

[jomish]

I am just checking about this 'bundle' business. Do I have to send the bundle to MCOL and Lloyds TSB solicitors. I have a court date of 1st June 2007.

[BARTY]

Originally Posted by jomish

I am just checking about this 'bundle' business. Do I have to send the bundle to MCOL and Lloyds TSB solicitors. I have a court date of 1st June 2007.

Hi
You need to send it to your local Court where you got the Court date letter from and a copy to the Solicitors, do NOT send it to MCOL.
Barty

[Johnsworld]

Hi Gary,

I'm under pressure to get my bundle submitted by next Friday so excuse me if my brain is not functioning too well.

I read your post about the OFT summary and am now worried about what to include.

You say "No need to print out the whole thing, but you do need the front cover, section 1 "overview" and most importantly, section 4.21 "Disguised penalties". You should put this in INSTEAD of the OFT report summary from the Basic Bundle in the templates library.

My case is against Barclays and I have used the summary from the basic bundle.

Does your advice only apply to Lloyds claimants or should I replace it as well?

THe AQ has been dispensed with and I have a hearing date. I must submit copies of all the documents I intend to rely on but I'm confused as to whether I need to produce a Statement of Evidence. It hasn't been asked for specifically.

Hope you can clarify.

Thanks,
John.

[GaryH]

Hi John,

Not essential I don't think - Barclays don't specifically defend on the basis that the charges are a service - but its still useful to include. Just add section 4.21 alongside the summary.

No need for a statement of evidence, but it would be advisable to include a witness statement. Use the one in this thread amended to suit.

HTH

[Johnsworld]

Thanks Gary,

There is so much to try and remember so it is good to have somebody to bounce questions off.

It is much appreciated.

Regards,
John.

[GaryH]

No problem.

[olliebollie]

GaryH

Lloyds specific Witness statement for inclusion in court bundles. Amend to suit;

Quote:

1st Witness Statement of [you]
Exhibit [initials then 1]
[date]

I know this is a daft question but should the "date" on the witness statement be the date you send it in with the bundle or your court date.

Also in the witness statement:-
10. It is admitted that the Defendants charges were levied in accordance with the terms and conditions of the account in question. However, it is submitted that the Defendants charges are not related to or intended to represent any actual loss arising from a breach of contract, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant, which by virtue of the legislation cited in paragraph 10 above, exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

Should that read: paragraph 9 above???

Thanks
Bev

[olliebollie]

Olli Thread one is #1 the very first post on this thread by Gary, it has links to all you need for the bundel
Pen

Sorry Pen, only just spotted your reply so apologies for delay in thanking you.

Bev

[GaryH]

Yes, the date you sign the statement.

Ooops! Yes, so it should! I'll change it now, thanks.

[olliebollie]

GARYH

Big Thanks.

Bev