Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | HSBC, FD and HFC successes **Existing Successful Claims Only *NO* New Threads Please** - Contact a moderator to move your thread | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
14th May 2006, 17:18
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Site Team | barracad v HSBC **WON** Woohoo!! First things first... Fab site!!
Right then, I sent the Data Protection Act letter to HSBC on 14th March. I already knew the amount I was claiming (£2125) but thought I should get the details on manual intervention 'just in-case'.
It took HSBC until 11th April to even acknowledge my request. They agreed to send all my statements free of charge, and with regards to manual intervention they said Although many of our systems are automated, a "manual intervention" by HSBC staff may be required in a variety of situations including; account opening, dealing with correspondence or telephone calls, when deposits or withdrawals are made over the counter at our branches and from time tim time during account administration.
I replied to this on 13th April making it clear that I needed to know details of manual intervention relating to my account, and reminding them they had until 23rd April (40 days) to provide this information.
To date, they have completely ignored this request, so I complained to the Information Commissioner on 2nd May hoping this would get them to provide the notes. I have still heard nothing from HSBC or the Information Commissioner.
So I need some advice, should I wait to see if HSBC provide any details regarding manual intervention or should I just proceed with the Prelim letter? I know at this stage I don't need it but I wanted to be prepared if it ever reached court (and I know it's a big 'if').
If it did reach court and they argued manual intervention, would the fact that I've waited this long go in my favour? All advice appreciated.
Last edited by barracad; 15th May 2006 at 15:48.
|
| |
14th May 2006, 17:24
|
#2 (permalink)
| |
Lueeze
Guest | Re: My dealings with HSBC so far... Do you know the amount yes?
If so do the prelim, and LBA after 14 days and then file in court.
Dont worry about the manul intervention as this is about as much as they will disclose on that!
If they have failed to provide statements then you can take them to court for this too!
I would chase the Information Commissioner as well!
Lou x | |
| |
14th May 2006, 17:24
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: My dealings with HSBC so far... Hi,
You are doing everything right so far. Proceed with your preliminary letter, and start your timetable for claiming. It is unlikely you will receive any more transaction details from HSBC.
The claim won't reach court (very unlikely to...) and therefore their defence of manual intervention is irrelevant. However, they would need to provide this to you if they were going to use it in defence. They haven't, and therefore they won't.
Once you have sent the prelim, ignore everything they say to you that isn't an offer for settlement. They like playing the scare tactics game - all you need to focus on is them repaying you what is rightfully yours.
Good luck.
__________________ Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come. All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. |
| |
15th May 2006, 21:13
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: My dealings with HSBC so far... Prelim sent today.
Thanks.
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org |
| |
27th May 2006, 10:36
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Site Team | 1st offer received Received response to Prelim today from HSBC offering me £1863 out of the £2175 claimed. Not far from the full amount, so very tempting, but am going to send LBA asking for full amount instead.
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org |
| |
27th May 2006, 11:17
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: My dealings with HSBC so far... Any comments/suggestions on this amended LBA before I send it? Quote: Dear Mr Pretty, Thank you for your letter dated 25th May offering a partial refund of my total claim. I am willing to accept the part payment offered by you for £1863, however please be aware that I will still pursue the remaining amount. As stated in my previous correspondence, I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations. As I have mentioned in my previous correspondence, I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law. I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary. I calculate that you have taken £2,175 (less any partial settlement as detailed above). I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice. Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department. Finally, I also note your suggestion that I complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service if dissatisfied with this decision. However, please be advised that it would be inappropriate to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service where the only forum which can determine a dispute on the legality of charges is my local court. Yours sincerely, |
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org
Last edited by barracad; 27th May 2006 at 11:21.
|
| |
9th June 2006, 11:33
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: My dealings with HSBC so far... Further letter from HSBC received today - this time from Phil Beaumont.
This time no mention of an offer or anything - I'm assuming this means they've withdrawn their previous offer of £1863.
It's just a basic "naff off and go to the ombudsman" letter.
Looks like it's time to go to court!!
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org |
| |
18th June 2006, 11:34
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: barracad v HSBC Claim filed
6QZ39491
£2549.37 + £120 Court fee
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org |
| |
23rd June 2006, 18:17
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: barracad v HSBC **WON** Woohoo!!
__________________ Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. "Some people say The Stig chews on spark plugs and drifts while walking. Some say he is terrified of ducks, and that there is an airport in Russia named after him. All we know is that he is really barracad from The Consumer Action Group" - Jeremy Clarkson (allegedly) www.unsubscribe-me.org www.LOVEstoke.org
Last edited by monkey_uk; 24th June 2006 at 22:16.
|
| | |