The great interest rate rip off

[interestrateripoff]

See the end of the thread for latest views/news.

I have a simple question, why should any increase in the cost of borrowing go to the banking sector bottom line, rather than paying off the debt owed? Why is it in the economic interest of the country for the money to go to the banking system rather than reducing the level of personal debt?

I am seeking help in mounting a legal challenge over the legality of using interest rates to control inflation, primarily my objection is that currently the consumer see’s no benefit in any increase in the cost of borrowing I argue this increased cost should be coming off the debt owed by the individual and not funding the bottom line of the banking sector.

I want to challenge the Bank of England in court over the use of interest rates to control inflation, there is no justification in law, economically or morally to simply make borrowing more expensive to control inflation. Therefore the BoE is acting illegally by allowing the banking system to simply take our hard earned money cash to fund the bottom line

£100,000 @ 3.5% APR = £3500 a year in interest July 10 2003
£100,000 @ 5.25% APR = £5250 a year in interest Jan 2007

So far over the past 4 years there has been an inflation busting 50% rise in the cost of borrowing under the guise of controlling inflation. If the interest rate goes to 5.75% as many economists expect this means an inflation busting 65% raise in the cost of borrowing. This would mean for every £100,000 owed approx £5750 will be taken in interest with none of this money going to the debt owed. The banking system is raking in an extra £1750 a year of our money for doing nothing.

Surely if interest rates control inflation a 50% rise over 4 years would have controlled the problem, unless of course they don’t!

1. Interest rates are only fuelling banking sector profits
2. Interest rates don’t control inflation
3. Increased repayments should go to reducing personal debt levels not banks profits
4. Personal lending limits should be set
5. Maximum mortgage multiples should be set
6. Interest rates don’t combat raising oil prices, energy prices etc...
7. Interest rates don’t combat inflation caused by tax raises

If you start digging deeper you find that it’s the banking sector helping to fuel inflation by recklessly lending money. The current system does not penalise the banks for reckless lending, if they lend out too much money and cause inflation they are rewarded with higher interest rates which we pay for! It’s the consumer paying for poor banking decisions over lending. The only way banks can increase profits is by lending more money, this is a vicious circle and it’s the consumer who pays the price with inflation and higher borrowing costs.

Inflation isn’t helped by the pressures of the stock market, energy prices, tax raises etc… yet our governor of the Bank of England remains silent, just blames the consumer and makes them pay.

I’ve already contacted the Bank of England and so far they haven’t given me any economic evidence why it’s in the economic interest of the country for the increases in the cost of borrowing to go towards the bottom line rather than paying off debt.

If anyone here can give me the economic argument for this I look forward to reading it.

Please note I have tried to keep this simple and brief, inflation is a complex issue but it’s cannot be control simply by increasing the cost of borrowing and ensuring the consumer pays for it 100% which the current system does.

However I know there isn’t one and I want my overpayments to the bank back AND TAKEN OFF WHAT I OWE ON MY MORTGAGE.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/mortgages/ - Deadline to sign up by: 20 May 2007

There currently is a petition here please sign and protest, this petition has not been created by me but I’ve already signed it.

If anyone can help please get in touch, no central bank has ever been taken to court, it's time they where and asked to justify what they are doing. If your fed up help spread the word and join the fight.

[interestrateripoff]

BBC NEWS | Business | Interest rates 'must hit 5.75%'

The Bank of England should raise interest rates to 5.75% by June in order to guard against wage-driven inflation, a think tank has warned.

While rates are expected to go up from 5.25% to 5.5% next month, the National Institute for Economic and Social Research says a bigger rise is needed.


It points to the fact that the UK's retail price inflation (RPI) rate is currently at a 16-year high of 4.8%.


RPI is the basis for many annual pay deals agreed at this time of the year.

Not that people are fighting for higher wages to meet the higher mortgage repayments then!!!!

[interestrateripoff]

BBC NEWS | Business | Bank sees 'sharp' inflation drop

Bank sees 'sharp' inflation drop

Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said that there could be a "sharp" decline in the UK's rate of inflation over the next four to six months.

Giving testimony to parliament, Mr King said the Bank was determined to bring inflation back within its 2% target.


The Bank also said that the strength of the UK housing market over the past year was a "significant" development.


The comments come as many analysts are predicting that interest rates will increase in May to slow price growth.

Bank pledges better rate guidance

The Bank of England will aim in future to give financial markets a better insight into its economic thinking.

The pledge comes amid rising pressure on the central bank, as it marks 10 years of setting the UK's monetary policy independent of the government.


Last month, the Bank was forced to write an unprecedented letter to the Chancellor explaining why inflation had risen by 1% over its target.


Analysts expect rates to be raised to 5.5% at the next meeting on 10 May.

[interestrateripoff]

King sees money growth as danger sign-Business-Economics-TimesOnline

Rapid growth in the supply of money and credit in the economy may be a warning signal of inflationary risks, Mervyn King, the Bank of England Governor, conceded last night, in comments that will harden expectations of new interest-rate increases.

After an attack on the Bank last month from economists who accused its Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of paying too little heed to the role of money growth in the recent surge in inflation, Mr King admitted that these factors could signal that base rates had been at the wrong level.


“It is quite possible for there to be unwarranted money supply shocks . . . The MPC must always be looking for warning signals of this,” he said. “There are times where monetary developments have . . . [proved] a warning sign of inflationary risks.”


The Governor’s comments, to the Society of Business Economists, came as he defended the MPC’s record amid a recent outbreak of criticism since inflation climbed to a ten-year high of 3.1 per cent, forcing him for the first time to write an explanatory letter to the Chancellor.

Well done Mervyn, the banks are lending out too much money increasing inflationary pressures and quite rightly the consumer should pay, as giving them even more profit will teach them not to be so reckless. Lets tax the poorest even more and give the money to the rich.

For £250,000 a year, your worth every penny Mervyn.

[meagain]

Methinks someone has the wrong end of the stick. The BoE rate is for high-volume lending between major institution. The rate is currently 5.25%, and I challenge you to find a reasonable mortgage at that rate available today. If you want to mount a challenge, perhaps you should challenge the notion that a 25bp rise in the base rate translates to 500bp increase in card rates, while a 25bp cut is not reflected.

[strangewayofsavin]

hi meagain, but although aimed at a higher level of borrowing, are you suggesting that it does not cause any effect lower down, or financial institutes don't take advantage, I am afraid my mortgage goes up by approx £22 every 1/4% raise, and if as predictited may could see a raise of 1/2%, I agree with mr interest man. why punish me for Mr Browns lack of ability to forcast economic growth?
I must admit Gordon is very effective at drumming up new ways of taking my cash.

[meagain]

Originally Posted by strangewayofsavin'

hi meagain, but although aimed at a higher level of borrowing, are you suggesting that it does not cause any effect lower down, or financial institutes don't take advantage

I'm suggesting no such thing, but I am suggesting that the BoE should not be responsible for what, as you correctly say, is a matter of financial institutions taking advantage of it. Much of what the OP says about the idea of not using interest rates to deal with inflation is horrendously misguided and naîve.

I am afraid my mortgage goes up by approx £22 every 1/4% raise,

That's your problem, and nobody else's. You decided to take out a mortgage knowing that the rate can go up as well as down. Those of us that are closer to the poverty line don't have to worry about such things, unable as we are to afford to even think about buying a house in the first place.

[strangewayofsavin]

Originally Posted by meagain070696

That's your problem, and nobody else's. You decided to take out a mortgage knowing that the rate can go up as well as down. Those of us that are closer to the poverty line don't have to worry about such things, unable as we are to afford to even think about buying a house in the first place.

yes it is my problem, but when i purchased my property some years ago, i did not beleive that people would be stupid enough to vote Labour in.

[ian1969uk]

Originally Posted by strangewayofsavin'

yes it is my problem, but when i purchased my property some years ago, i did not beleive that people would be stupid enough to vote Labour in.

As opposed to the Conservative's brilliant job in the past of getting interest rates up to 15%.

Think before you post.

[ian cognito]

Ah yes I remember it well, interest rates of 15% and credit card interest of 30% - how times have changed........well perhaps not

[meagain]

Originally Posted by ian cognito

Ah yes I remember it well, interest rates of 15% and credit card interest of 30% - how times have changed........well perhaps not

Hey, things have changed massively since then. The base rate is 5.25%, and credit card interest is ... oh.

[ian cognito]

I rest my case m'lud

[strangewayofsavin]

I did not vote tory or lib dem or labour, I think they all feel they could do better, but once they are in they have their own personal agenda, as for the interest rate, I fear it is becoming a sort of stealth tax, yes the interest rate flew up in the early 1990's, but it is governed by the BOE, who are suppossed to predict economic changes, and change to suit, it has been clear for a couple of years, that house prices continue to rise, so why did they not kill the trend off with a 1% hike 12 months ago, probably because there is no long term profit in doing so.

[meagain]

Here's the bit you evidently fail to understand. The interest rate is the cost of borrowing. An increase in the rate of interest means your outstanding debt just got more expensive. It also got more expensive for the commercial banks who were borrowing from the BoE. Are you suggesting that next time the cost of wheat shoots up it should not affect the price of bread?

[ian cognito]

If the price of wheat went up 0.25% and the price of bread went up 15% (at least 1 'bank' has done this in the past 6 months) then, yes I say thats wrong, especially as it means some people will no longer be able to eat bread, going back to the corn laws?

I think to compare the cost of a hike of a few pence on a loaf of bread with a subtantially higher hike on several loans is a little out of perspective. We are not talking people having to buy their bread at Aldi instead of Waitrose, we are talking people losing their homes, marriages, and the goods they have worked hard for as happened a heartbreaking amount in the 80's.

[meagain]

Originally Posted by ian cognito

I think to compare the cost of a hike of a few pence on a loaf of bread with a subtantially higher hike on several loans is a little out of perspective.

Not at all. Unless, of course, you're suggesting that increasing the value of all bread in the country by a few million is OK while increasing the value of all debt by a few million is not.