Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here.
UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - see announcement ConsumerWiki
N.B. Please note - due to postage costs these products are only available in the U.K.
Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 155,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes.
Reclaim the Right!
The Lawpack Small Claims Kit contains everything you need to get your bank charges refund. Sample forms, Instruction manual, template forms and an entire set of court forms in .PDF format on CDRom.
Just type in the details of your claim and print them out.
Reclaim the Right!
Sue your bank as often as you like with one Lawpack!!
With a Lawpack and Patricia Pearl’s book on Small Claims, you have everything you need to get your unfair bank charges refunded or assert other consumer rights.
(England & Wales only)
CAG Forum Users Price £11.99
(click image to buy)
Plus £1 P&P
Reclaim the Right!
Small Claims Procedure by Judge Patricia Pearl
An excellent guide for the layperson Not for use in Scotland
Remember...you can't take your reclaimed bank charges with you ;-)
Do your Internet search here
Your Internet search-box
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
Do your Internet search here:-
Your Internet searchbox
Come and chat with us here (NB: External site NOT affiliated with CAG)
CAG Announcements
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Updated letters and claims templates are now available in the templates library
You must be registered to access these
Registration is free
GeneralCome here to discuss general issues in the unlawful charging by banks debate.
Any general issues about unfair bank charges.
Welcome to The Consumer Action Group
and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges.
We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name
full report from an entertaining afternoon at Kingston County Court **MUST READ**
Along with 30-40 others I was at Kingston upon Thames County Court this afternoon for a direction hearing with Barclays bank amongst others.
I know a lot of people are nervous about the possibility of going to court so I took a few notes with a view to reporting back and I must be honest it was a couple of hours of excellent entertainment.
First of all the cast.
The judge was a very well presented and instantly likeable bloke. A bit like Ken Barlow on Coronation Street. It was clear from the start that he wasn’t going to miss the opportunity to entertain in front of what was a capacity crowd in Court Two.
On the front row representing Barclays was a youngish lady in her late twenties looking every inch the up and coming Lawyer, impeccably dressed, hair tied up, small bifocals. She had a huge file in front of her containing the details of all the dreadful people who had the nerve to challenge Barclays.
To her left was a rather distinguished duo who were representing a No win No fee company and subsequently it turned out were representing a significant number of the claimants listed for the day
Directly behind them, relegated to the 2nd row was the rather sad looking figure representing Lloyds TSB. Compared to the snappy dressers in the front row he was clearly 2nd division and if on the off chance your reading this treat yourself to a new tie. No one is going to take you seriously wearing that!!!
The rest of the court room was packed with 30-40 claimants and you could cut the atmosphere with a knife as everyone was thinking the same “ Please don’t let it be me called first”
The first business of the afternoon was to deal with some overspill from the morning involving Lloyds. 3 or 4 cases had clearly been settled as a result of some frantic phone calls during the lunch break. The case names were mentioned and the bloke from Lloyds repeated several times weve settled. There appeared to be a dispute about the account number on one of these cases as the claimant had written the wrong number on his schedule.
Sensing his opportunity the man from Lloyds jumped to his feet shouting “Move to strike out the claim” “Don’t be ridiculous” retorted the judge “just put the correct account number on the schedule” We will settle” mumbled the man from Lloyds somewhat disheartened by his failure.
I personally don’t like to kick a man when he’s down but the judge showed no such sympathy. “Are you a barrister,” he asked “ No he replied” “ A legal clerk” no” “What are you then” asked the judge “ I used to be an old managing clerk”
A slight titter could be heard from the big hitters in ringside seats as the man from Lloyds buried his face in his papers.
Then from nowhere appeared a flighty young lad, plonked himself next to the Barclays barrister and in a lawyer sort of way gained the attention of the Judge. He was representing the bank of Ireland and needed to get away quickly so could he go first.
The judge obliged and the claimant in this case stood up. The flighty man from Ireland informed the judge that everything had been sorted out (They Settled) and the claimant had consented to the case being withdrawn. The judge asked the claimant if he agreed “ absolutely” he replied “I’ve got to get back and open up my pub and by the way there’s a Gin and Tonic waiting for you on the house”
The judge smiled “I better not but I’m sure my clerk could do with one”
Things had started well for the claimants and you could feel the relief in the court.
Next up was Nat West or well they would have been had they turned up. The claimant informed the judge that they had agreed to settle but he hadn’t had the money yet. The judge agreed to an adjournment to allow time for the money to be paid.
The young claimant wasn’t finished there. “Id like to apply for costs” he demanded. The judge didn’t look at all fazed and asked what he would like. Buoyed by this the claimant produced his civil procedure book, no doubt purchased from this site, and started to quote from it.
The judge appeared caught by surprise and stopped him. “ If you are going to start quoting civil procedure rules we are going to have to put you at the end”
The claimant left a bit crest fallen but lived to fight on later in the day.
It was then time for the first of the many Barclays cases. The case was called, the pristine Lady from Barclays flicked to the correct page in her huge file with ruthless efficiency.
Distinguished gent to her left rises and states he represents the claimant.
Pristine Lady states that Barclays have not received a schedule of charges so could not deal with the claim.
Distinguished gent states “that’s a bit surprising as they are stapled to the back of the Form N1 of which you have a copy”
Judge agrees and there is an uncomfortable silence as the pristine lady ruffles thru her papers.
“Ill have to take instructions”
“You do that” states the judge!! Adjourned for Barclays to get their Act together.
Then followed about 7 or 8 Barclays cases with the same outcome.
"No schedule of charges" she muttered.
I’ve sent them to you a hundred times shouted the claimant.
"Ill have to take instructions" ever more quietly
Then came the first mention of expenses from one of the claimants. “I’ve had to take a day of work to come here can I claim costs”.
The judge seemed receptive “What is your job” he asked
“Telephonist” she replied
How long have you been here?
“3 hours”
How much do you earn?
“£7 an hour”.
“That seems reasonable to me costs awarded £21”.
You could here the cogs werring in the brains of the claimants as they sniffed an opportunity.
Every case after that the opportunity for costs was ruthlessly exploited
“What do you do for a living sir?”
“Consultant sir” states the defendant
“How much do you earn an hour?”
“£50” stated the defendant
“How long have you been here?”
“Since this morning sir”
“£270 costs awarded”
“What about my car park bill that’s another £10”
“£280 costs awarded.”
One optimistic claimant even tried to get Barclays to pay for the possibility that she may be clamped in the local car park.
That was one step to far for the ever-generous judge who with a wry smile politely refused.
Next up Abbey National. Several defendants were awarded judgements and costs on an ever-increasing scale as Abbey couldn’t be bothered to turn up
Even the man from Lloyds was joining in the party. Realising that he was on the wrong side of a bit of a hiding he started advising one of the Abbey national claimants on how to calculate 8%.
One claimant from alliance and Leicester (Who also failed to turn up) was despatched from the court by the judge to find a calculator so he could add up the daily interest rate.
amongst the carnage There were a few successes for the banks
A couple of Barclay’s claimants failed to turn up and their claim was struck out. The not so pristine lady from Barclays asked for costs.
“How much do you earn” asked the judge.
Surly she wasn’t going to answer !! She muttered, stumbled then came out with the old favourite “ Ill have to take instructions”
The judge took sympathy on her and adjourned the hearing pending costs.
A couple of other significant things happened.
Alliance and Leicester had written to the judge stating they were going to defend one claim. The defendant was furious.
“They should have been here then” he snorted.
The judge with another crippling blow ordered full disclosure by the A & L within 14 days or their defence would be struck out
He calmed the claimant by informing him that he need do nothing and he should expect some sort of offer of settlement as soon as they receive that letter.
Several claimants asked if members of their family could speak on their behalf and this was allowed although to be honest it wasn’t necessary.
I left the court just after 3.30 having witnessed a complete route of the banks on almost all fronts.
Lessons learnt.
Don’t be afraid of the court
Do turn up
Have all your paperwork with you
Work out your costs and settlement figure before hand
I know this is only one court in one part of the country but hopefully this will encourage everyone to keep at it.
Re: full report from an entertaining afternoon at Kingston County Court
totally agree with money fantastic post and yes everybody on the forum should read it you hear the word court mentioned and straightaway dread and panic set in
All advice is offered in good faith and with care taken over the accuracy. Some is mere opinion some based on law. Feel free to use information provided, however, never act on legal advice offered by anonymous strangers with out first checking it out You know it makes sense
Re: full report from an entertaining afternoon at Kingston County Court
Just a question on this, if you go to court having agreed a settlement but not received funds, and the Bank's representative states that a settlement has been agreed, aren't the bank then breaching the confidentiality of the 'Without Prejudice' they put on their own letters? Even more so if your acceptance states 'Without Prejudice' too?
Re: full report from an entertaining afternoon at Kingston County Court
I wouldnt have thought so, as all they are saying is an agreement has been reached, and are not going into the details of it, they are not disclosing any information on the letters ect, although i could be wrong and if i am i apologise, but thats the way i see it.