Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Employment Problems Do you have problems at work for any reason including disability, harassment, discrimination? Are you facing disciplinary action? Are you failing to get employment because of some disability or discrimination problem? Discuss it here. | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  |
10th June 2008, 00:37
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: TUPE - Legal? Quote:
Originally Posted by willie59 This is a little complicated. The company I work for has various offices around the country. A number of employees from different offices (including me) have been informed that we are likely to be TUPE’d to another company shortly. All the people involved, except me, previously TUPE’d into our current company from this company. They therefore are being ‘reverse TUPEd’. I am not sure if there are differences in the law between TUPE and reverse TUPE. No difference at all - an employee can be TUPE'd in and out out under the same sets of rules.
We have been informed that the company intends to move our jobs to another part of the country. Further, they have said that they are exempt from the TUPE rule about making people redundant within 6 months of the transfer. I am not sure if this is indeed legal. There is no '6 month rule' - the regulations regarding TUPE make no specific provision for a set time period during which the new employer is prevented from making changes. The new employer can in fact make redundancies at any time, but has to be very careful in that he can demonstrate 'Economical, Technical or Organisational (ETO)' reasons for doing so. He may not make redundancies to discard surplus staff in order to save money, nor can he use redundancy as a means of harmonising two sets of staff - this is classed as dismissing staff 'due to the transfer itself'. What he can do though, and it would seem applicable in your case, is cite that there are ETO reasons 'entailing a change in the workforce', and providing that dismissals are conducted fairly, with proper consultation arrangements, notice or pay in lieu of notice and statutory redundancy payments made, then there is every chance that the dimissal would be deemed fair. Your getout in this situation, if there is a chance at all, is that the employer must demonstrate that the ETO reason for the dismissal would involve your function in the organisation ceasing, or that it is neccessary to reduce the number of people required to cover the work. Very difficult to prove though.
The biggest issue I have, is that this company does not now have an office even remotely close to our current location (it did at the time of the original TUPE). They have said that from the day of the transfer onwards they want us to work from home (until they make us redundant). This does not sound legal to me? Possibly not, for if your contract under the current employer states a normal base to operate from then the new employer would either have to maintain such a base or provide the same equipment and facilities to permit you to function from home. This might be computer equipment, stationery, a consideration for heating and lighting, telephone - it depends on the nature of your employment and the extent to which you need an office or warehouse to operate from.
Any advice would be welcomed. | What you must make sure of is that you are being given adequate consultation over the change. You must be given the opportunity to ask all relevant questions and be given full responses. Your terms of employment must be maintained as if the transfer was not taking place, including any annual pay reviews or bonus payments which were made under the old employer (although the new employer does not have to maintain pension current arrangement, even though he must offer a similar scheme with similar levels of contribution). If redundancy is being considered then this is subject to additional rights which must be adhered to in order for the dismissal to be 'fair' in law.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate. If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the scales! |
| |
Do your Internet search here:
The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are registered trademarks Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road,
London,
NW11 7PE
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.
|