Quote:
Originally Posted by patdavies Thank God.
Somebody else who understands how the Data Protection Act works and that only information held in a relevant filing system is even covered by the Act - never mind available via a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). |
For unfair dismissal cases, which the OP's situation could well lead to, it is
always wise to submit a Subject Access Request to the employers, whether or not the employer is registered with the IOC. Any good employment lawyer will suggest doing this.
In my particular constructive dismissal situation the small employer I had worked for encashed the £10 cheque and sent some paper work to me suggesting he had satisfied the Subject Access Request.
I was not happy with the response so I sent a complaint off to the IOC.
My complaint was assigned to a casework team and, although still ongoing, it has been discovered from May of this year that:
1 The employer had no registeration valid with the IOC.
2 They should have been as their handling of information was subject to the Data Protection Act, Freedom of Information Act 2000 along with an associated regulation-Privacy and Electronic Communications Regs 2003.
3 They obviously should not have encashed the £10 cheque.
4 I am able to refer to this and, crucially, reinforce my allegations they did not follow correct procedure on employment matters, at my upcoming Pre-hearing review where there is a good chance my former employers grounds for resistance in their response be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The investigation by the IOC into this company may take until November.
One should never assume that an employer just conducts staff records, rather, even with a small employer, the nature of their business is more of an indicator.
You really do talk some waffle and are a mere hinderance to people seeking advise.