| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Notices | PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate |
31st May 2009, 20:00
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Hello all,
quick question. I had an egg credit card and the debt has been sold on to another company. I want to claim back the charges so who do i claim against, egg or the company they sold the debt onto?
thanks  |
| |
1st June 2009, 04:27
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Site Team | re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** You claim them back from Egg
__________________ Steven Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial Do you want to know if a credit agreement is enforceable? Rather than sending a PM about a particular agreement, see Consumer Credit Agreements
My Claims GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
1st June 2009, 12:00
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** thank you steven  |
| |
2nd July 2009, 12:06
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** This is the key parts of the response i got from egg this morning. Would appreciate some help on a response:
Dear Woodwa5
Your Credit Card agreement with Egg clearly stated that charges will be added to your account if you exceed your credit limit or fail to make your contractual payments. In accordance with condition 7 of the agreement, a charge of £20(or since Aug 2006 £16) has been added to your account each time you exceeded your credit limit or failed to make a payment.
Your letter alleges that these charges are a penalty (my fault, used an old template)despite having not put forward evidence to support this allegation. The charges set out in the agreement are a genuine pre-estimate of the loss caused to egg when a customer breaks the terms of their agreement.
You may have noted the media coverageof the OFT investigation into defualt charges. The OFT stated that a default charge should only beused to recover certain limited admin costs (they then list things such as it, postage etc). The OFT set a threshold for intervention at £12.00 but stated that default fees should not be equivalent to the threshold.
The OFT stated that the presumption of unfareness in relation to charges over £12 would not apply where there areexceptional business factors. The therefore acknowledged that in those circumstances, a card issuer may be able to set a fair charge above the £12 threshold.
The OFT, as an example, specifically referred to Eggs practice of requiring all customers to pay the minimum monthly payment by direct debit. Following the conclusion of the investigation, the OFT indicated that it would not proceed further against EGG on the basis that egg reduced its charges from £20 TO £16. Accordingly, without any admission of liability as to the previous level of charges, Egg reduced to £16. The OFT has taken no further action against Egg.
This reduction does not apply retrospectively, however in your case we are prepared, without any admission of liability, to apply the reduction to the £20 charges.
If this offer is acceptable to you, we will credit your account with a total of £32 (I am asking for nearly £350 on 9 charges). They then list the charges missing one out.
An acceptance form is enclosed for you to sign and return.
Your account records show that Capquest have the account, therefore we will be contacting them to establish what balance is still owed so that we can arrange a payment for the charges.
They then go on to talk about six months to contact the FSA  |
| |
2nd July 2009, 12:13
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** So two issues really:
(i) How do I get them to pay the full amount (i've used 13.5% INTEREST AS THAT IS WHAT THEY CHARGED ME).
(ii) What the hell do I do regarding getting the money back and it not going to Capquest. I currently pay the £55 per month. I cca's them some time ago and they sent me a load of documents from Egg. This basically consisted of my accounts and the original signed agreement. Capquest state they own the debt and the account shows a 'charge off' SOME TIME AGO AND THEN A ZERO BALANCE. I have also noticed that the date on my signature is a day after their signature, which means they had already signed it by the time I got the application form, Is that correct?
I am confused as to the best way forward  |
| |
2nd July 2009, 21:51
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Quote:
Originally Posted by woodwa5 So two issues really:
(i) How do I get them to pay the full amount (i've used 13.5% INTEREST AS THAT IS WHAT THEY CHARGED ME).
(ii) What the hell do I do regarding getting the money back and it not going to Capquest. I currently pay the £55 per month. I cca's them some time ago and they sent me a load of documents from Egg. This basically consisted of my accounts and the original signed agreement. Capquest state they own the debt and the account shows a 'charge off' SOME TIME AGO AND THEN A ZERO BALANCE. I have also noticed that the date on my signature is a day after their signature, which means they had already signed it by the time I got the application form, Is that correct?
I am confused as to the best way forward  | On charges refund deal with Egg, not Capquest. Capquest's pressure for payment is an unrelated issue. It has been established for 2 years that Egg management, even Egg lawyers, do not want to defend penalty charges reclaim in court. What you received was a standard computer-generated letter to kid the uninitiated. There may be one more template brushoff letter from them, no more. Eggployees are required to go through the charade even though they know they intend to pay out in the end. As a rule when they cave in they volunteer to add 8% p.a. "statutory interest" on top. Very doubtful you will get more. You could try, but it will slow down repayment, and you could finish up in court defending a contractual interest reclaim already defeated in the High Court.
Simply ignore Egg template letters and press on with your own template letter based on the following: 01 weeks - 30 APR 2007 - WINNING TEMPLATE LETTER - Eggmail then 2-day payout - moc1982 v Egg
See: V-E Day: Victory over Egg
If you demonstrate you know the end result, Egg will not be encouraged to indulge in more mumbo-jumbo. They do not want to face you in court and set a precedent amidst press publicity to encourage more claimants, so will pay up, in many cases within a week, in others over 2, 3 months.
"Charge Off" means that for tax and accounting reasons Egg wrote off your balance as a loss. Your account at Egg no longer has a balance, but your debt at Capquest does. This does not remove Egg's answerability for Overlimit and Late Payment penalty charges which are reclaimable for up to 6 years back. You say they are unlawful. Egg do not want to argue in court.
Good luck.
__________________
Last edited by Mistermind; 2nd July 2009 at 21:56.
|
| |
2nd July 2009, 23:17
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Thank you sooo much for your reply. I have noted after reading so many threads today that the agreement i had with egg was unenforcable and i will challenge it with capquest. Will this effect my claim with egg and how do i stop them from giving the money straight to capquest?
thanks  |
| |
3rd July 2009, 00:19
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,385
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Egg is a separate legal entity from Capquest. Egg is answerable in their own name to the regulator and to the law for what charges they levied. Chances are Egg have sold this debt to Capquest for a fraction.
If you still had an ongoing account with balance owing, then it would be hard to argue if Egg chose to refund charges back into the same account where charges were levied in the first place. But you no longer have an account with Egg.
All reported past experience suggests Egg will refund you direct, they will probably ask for a bank account you nomiinate, as they do not like sending cheques through the post. No need to discuss this with Capquest and give them ideas to give you hassle or try to intercept the refund.
Charges reclaim is known to be a success, in the case of Egg with very little hassle. No point in coupling a known winning campaign with an entirely different tussle without the same delivered results. It's your case to do as you choose. |
| |
3rd July 2009, 00:34
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Thank you. So in my reply to egg i will just put forward the info in the link you have suggested and highlight that the issue with capquest is in dispute and as they are a seperate entity should refund me and not capquest? |
| |
3rd July 2009, 15:52
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,385
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Charges refund is a legal issue between yourself and Egg.
Debt repayment is a legal issue between yourself and Capquest.
The two are unrelated, and nothing to be gained by raising an issue which does not arise. Egg clerks at the bottom of the food chain will trigger preset procedures when the expected cues arrive, i.e. a ritualised exchange of 2 or 3 letters, a dialogue between the deaf proven a hundred times.
Any extraneous issue raised will simply cause a letter to be filed at the bottom of the tray, as an exception from the rule for the attention of the next level up. Simply ask for a refund to you, offering your bank account and sortcode if you wish to shorten this choreographed dance. Egg are not going to pay Capquest, no point giving them the idea and a reason for delay. |
| |
3rd July 2009, 22:49
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Site Team | re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** What mistermind says - refuse to let them repay charges to Capquest - they ar nothing to do with them. If they repay them to Capquest, carry on with the claim for the full amount as they have't repaid you.
__________________ Steven Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial Do you want to know if a credit agreement is enforceable? Rather than sending a PM about a particular agreement, see Consumer Credit Agreements
My Claims GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
3rd July 2009, 23:53
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Quote:
Originally Posted by woodwa5 Sorry, my fault i don't think i made it clear. in their response to me they say Your account records show that Capquest have the account, therefore we will be contacting them to establish what balance is still owed so that we can arrange a payment for the charges. They then gop on to say that any charges will be credited to the account with capquest. I'm beginning to think that capquest don't own this account at all and it is just a lie | Times are very hard now at Citi cards, living on government bailout. They will do anything say anything to save money.
You can point out the record about "Charge Off and balance zero" (google then point out you understand they have written off the balance from Egg books.) They cannot reduce a balance which does not belong to them and is no longer their's to reduce. If they claim to be paying a third party they are still liable in law and answerable to the judge -- the last place they want to be. This is kidology and brinkmanship, waiting for you to blink.
Steven is right. Ignore them and read the riot act. |
| |
4th July 2009, 20:26
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,385
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Good.
Moc1982's argument is the one Egg cannot face in court, so they are unlikely to raise other difficulties which will get them there. No justification for Egg to pay third party Capquest any more than for them to refund into third party British Gas.
Egg has a cyle of 2 or 3 standard template response letters, so there may be two more on the way regardless of what you write, but eventually they will see sense -- any option but not those unanswerable questions in court.
Good luck. |
| |
4th July 2009, 20:51
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
| re: woodwa5 v egg cc ***WON*** Thank you for your help and thanx to Moc1982  |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|