Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Hold the Front Page!! News updates The Consumer Forums front page Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Credit Reference Agencies Experian, Equifax, CallCredit etc | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
6th November 2008, 19:06
|
#42 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
I am in: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 763
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited [Update] Has you may know, I took court action against Experian Limited for publishing incorrect data. Andrew Mills applied to the court to have my case struck out and be awarded over £700 of costs. Today was an application hearing to have the case struck out Andrew Mills and I both attended court Hearing lasted for 1.5 hours in total Outcome was, Application to have my case struck out was dismissed, and the judge ordered Case Allocation Questioner to be sent to claimant to be completed and returned. Andrew Mills invited me after the hearing for a quick chat. He as now agreed to go back to the banks and question the data again, but also ask to see proof. Andrew Mills, wanted me to suspend my case, pending there investigation into my disputes. I advised Andrew Mills, that I would only allow this, if they remove the data now or block it from being seen by other lenders. He denied this, so AQs will be filed with the court.
Last edited by UK26; 6th November 2008 at 19:11.
|
| |
6th November 2008, 20:05
|
#45 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
I am in: Cheshire
Posts: 1,304
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Hi UK26
They do not want your case heard in court
They don't want to attempt to pull the wool over a judges eyes the same way they do with a data subject.....I will bet before they will allow it to go to a full hearing they will offer you quite a bit of compensation linked to a non disclosure agreement.
sparkie |
| |
6th November 2008, 20:30
|
#46 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
I am in: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 763
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited that would be interesting |
| |
7th November 2008, 00:46
|
#51 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
I am in: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 763
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Thanks guys for your support, Mr Mills ant a happy bloke lol
I'm looking forward to the trial and watching Experian try there best to wiggle out of this lol |
| |
7th November 2008, 08:36
|
#52 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
I am in: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 763
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Hi
How would i apply for Summary Judgment? Quote:
Originally Posted by humbleman Excellent.
It must be very frustrating for them, having to justify their actions when in the past it has gone unchallenged.
UK26- Perhaps time for you to apply for a Summary Judgment, keep them under pressure. | |
| |
7th November 2008, 12:04
|
#53 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer | Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Quote:
Originally Posted by UK26 Hi
How would i apply for Summary Judgment? | Think you just fill N244, and no. 3 where it says what order are you asking the court to make, you would just say you want a summary judgment, since you don't think that the defendant has any prospect of defending this, thus no reason for it to go to trial, and you want to deal this by way of a hearing.
I am sure other experts will help fill in the missing bits. |
| |
7th November 2008, 12:30
|
#54 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: West London
Posts: 140
| Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Subbing
Hi UK26 I am watching with interest good luck although I don't think you will need it. If they could defend and were confident they will win why would they want to speak to you out of court at all?. As been said before...go get 'em.
DK your post #49 made me smile that was def' a victory well done for you and your kids although no more than you deserved. |
| |
7th November 2008, 19:02
|
#58 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: UK26 -V- Experian Limited Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesteruk Excellant result well done
I noticed they said they would check proof, they should do that anyway when the consumer brings a complaint up! cheeky blighter!
Good luck | Never mind when the consumer complains. They should do it for each and every item of data they hold. If they aren't able to do that due to the volume of data they hold they either need better systems or less data |
| | |