Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Hold the Front Page!! News updates The Consumer Forums front page Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
19th December 2007, 11:56
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: London
Posts: 30
| Vincenta vs Capital One Greetings!!! Finally made it thanks to the ever so helpful vendi, sorry WendyB!
Thanks Wendy, you're a starlet.  |
| |
19th December 2007, 11:58
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: London
Posts: 30
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One ************************* ************************* *****
Hello Folks this is just to introduce this new thread. I'm a newbie CAGer and will appreciate all your support and tips.
************************* ************************* *****
Have read through the forum posts and have been much encouraged by the success stories. In the 2002-2004 period, I was hammered by bank, credit card and loan providers as I was self-employed with poor cashflow and my credit suffered as a result. After deliberating the whole claim issue for almost two years now, I've finally decided to take some action with reclaiming - starting with my Capital One credit card.
My S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter goes out tomorrow, recorded delivery. |
| |
19th December 2007, 13:30
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Blimey, a starlet and a dame! I'm doing well for compliments today
You will find that Crap One are fairly straightforward,in my opinion, especially if its just charges and not default removal. Even better if there's no balance on your account, as then you get a nice cheque. They're a nice easy one to tackle first, to ease you into the whole charges thing.
Let us know how it goes and shout if you need help. |
| |
19th December 2007, 18:01
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Site Team
I am in: Lancashire
Posts: 9,795
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Welcome vincenta.
You will find all the help you need here - I see WendyB is already on the case so you are in good hands.
__________________ GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
You can e-mail me at steven4064 at consumeractiongroup.co.uk . However, please note, I will not give advice by PM or e-mail. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
20th December 2007, 13:13
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: London
Posts: 30
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Hey Ho. I've got the CAG bug bug bug!!! I'm going after
1. Ge Money - MEAF - £200ish
2. Ge Money - Mortgage penalties - £2-3000
3. NatWest - Current Account Fees - £500ish
4. Abbey - MEAF - £125ish
5. Abbey - Mortgage penalties - £300ish
6. Abbey - Current Account Fees - £200ish
7. Capital One - CCard Penalties - £500ish
8. HFC Bank Loan - Loan Penalties - £3000ish
9. Welcome Finance - Loan Penalties - £2000ish
10. Council Tax - Rebanding - about £2000ish
Total = £11,825.00
I hereby propose with every success, a minimum of 10% (£1,182.50) of my 'winnings' shall flow straight into the CAG fund!
Yessireee!! 
Last edited by vincenta; 9th January 2008 at 18:15.
Reason: Updating figures
|
| |
20th December 2007, 13:34
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Site Team
I am in: Lancashire
Posts: 9,795
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Go get 'em vincenta.
I would advise leaving the NatWest and Abbey current accounts until after the test case. Don't do anything about the mortgage penalties until you have taken advice - they are not the same as bank/credit card charges and you may not be able (or at least wise) to reclaim them.
But credit cards, loan companies and bank loans - easy peasy
Cap1 usually gives in quite quickly as do GE Money - I would start with them.
__________________ GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
You can e-mail me at steven4064 at consumeractiongroup.co.uk . However, please note, I will not give advice by PM or e-mail. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
20th December 2007, 17:42
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Site Team
I am in: 10 Miles Final
Posts: 9,773
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One The Mortgage penalties, are you looking at recovering ERC'S?
(Early Repayment Charges) |
| |
20th December 2007, 17:58
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Site Team
I am in: Lancashire
Posts: 9,795
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Sillygirl is not so silly - she is absolutely correct.
__________________ GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
You can e-mail me at steven4064 at consumeractiongroup.co.uk . However, please note, I will not give advice by PM or e-mail. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
20th December 2007, 18:44
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Site Team
I am in: Lancashire
Posts: 9,795
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One There were several cases on CAG earlier in the year where people tried to reclaim ERCs as contract penalties in the same way that banl charges are claimed. In several cases, it got to court and the case was lost because the claimant couldn't prove they had a contract with the mortgage company. And no contract, no contract penalties.
The reason is that mortgages are a very different animal to any other sort of credit agreement - as you said they are hedged in law. Normal contract law doesn't (seeem to) apply and neither do CCA1974 or UTCCR1999.
__________________ GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Claim 1 Won unconditionally August 2007 NatWest Claim 2 Statements received - on hold NatWest Claim 3 LBA sent - on hold Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007 Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Next Catalogue - Statements recieved Clydesdale Financial Services Won unconditionally February 2008 Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
You can e-mail me at steven4064 at consumeractiongroup.co.uk . However, please note, I will not give advice by PM or e-mail. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there. |
| |
21st December 2007, 14:00
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: London
Posts: 30
| Re: Vincenta vs Capital One Hi All Thanks for your various comments and suggestions. Yep, certainly no point starting with the harder cases first is there? So I'll definitely be taking them in order of ease first. On the mortgage front, I'm not looking at ERC/ERPs as that is only payable if you redeem your mortgage before a certain special period. If I did that on my current mortgage it'd be about £16K so "that ain't gonna happen!" I'm looking at those awful DD returned and arrears admin fees and interest charged on top etc. Fortunately, it's not with my current lender but the one I moved away from about a year ago. I'm certainly keeping them in my sights and with the way I was treated at the time, the least I can do is give it a go. |
| |
9th January 2008, 17:59
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
I am in: London
Posts: 30
| Re: Vincenta Reclaims Howdy Folks Trust you all had a good Christmas and New Year?!?!? Time for an update: Abbey have replied to MEAF letter with a letter trying to say my old mortgage started almost TWO YEARS later than it actually did (meaning a lower MEAF would be payable) and to confirm I actually want a refund. I've replied and corrected their error. Should be just a formality to get a payment from them soon. GE is yet to reply on the MEAF front. They charged me about £300 when I remortgaged away from them. Yet when I looked at all their docs for when I took the mortgage out, there was nothing to this effect there!!! I'm still tinkering with the idea of going after them for various fees applied to my mortgage account while I was with them for four years. Totals about £3000 for things like late payment/DD's bouncing/arrears account admin etc. Does anyone have any good information on reclaiming these? Still waiting for Subject Access Request replies from Capital One and NatWest. I've also taken on Council Tax!!! This is quite a biggie for me as I've lived here for 7 odd years. Two years ago I found out that a 4 bed detached not too far from mine (newer and bigger and more value) was on a band E. Another 4 bed Semi (newer and bigger and more value) is also on band E. This property is no 107 while mine is no 46. I've finally decided to stop sitting on my */?se and have spoken to and sent the valuation office a six page document showing all sorts of details why my property is NOT a band F but should actually be a band D and they're looking into it. Somehow, they mananged to allege that my 3 bedder is 141sqm while these fourbedders are a maximum of 127sqm??!?!? They were contending that mine is a bigger property! Of course they're wrong but fortunately, I have it on good authority from a RICS surveyor who valued my property in 2007 that it's size is a maximum 110sqm! We'll see who gets the last laugh. |
| | |