Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Campaign Are you interested in the bigger picture? Do you have definite ideas which you wish to contribute? Are you interested in campaigning in some way?
Whether it is bank charges, PPI, the cost of gas/electric/food/travel etc - this is the place to share your ideas. | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
6th September 2006, 11:09
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Your MP I emailed my MP the other day and got his response this morning. Very positive I think. Quote: Thank you for your e-mail.
I have already signed the following Early Day Motion relating to the issue:
EDM 2227 DEFAULT BANKING CHARGES 22.05.2006
That this House notes with concern the exorbitant costs to customers of default charges applied to current and credit card accounts, which cause distress and alarm to consumers, and in particular to the financially vulnerable; welcomes the statement by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) that a default charge should only be used to recover certain limited administrative costs; recognises the work by Which? to challenge excessive bank charges; commends the thousands of consumers who have challenged these default charges with their providers, many using the free information made available from Which?; and calls on current account and credit card providers to respond positively to OFT's statement.
I will also write to Ministers about this.
Regards
Paul Truswell | |
| |
12th September 2006, 15:47
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Your MP The other day I received copies of letters sent to Ed Balls MP (Economic Secretary) and Ian McCartney MP (Minister of State) by my MP, Paul Truswell. Is he prompt, or what? Wonder if I'll hear anything from these other two though... Quote:
BANK CHARGES
As you will be aware, the Office of Fair Trading recently found the current level of charges applied by UK high street banks to be excessive and that a cap should be imposed. The OFT also ruled that penalty charges are illegal under the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
You will also be aware that, despite these facts, banks continue to apply excessive charges and most customers do not question their legality. As someone who takes a very keen interest in consumer affairs issues and as a signatory of EDM 2227 this, the fact that banks are making around £3 billion a year from excessive illegal charges, concerns me deeply.
Please find enclosed an email I received from a constituent, who shares my aversion to these excessive charges. I would be very grateful if you could respond to the specific points she raises. I look forward to hearing from you. | |
| |
19th September 2006, 23:12
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Your MP Hi all...in follow up to my last post...
My MP wrote to Ed Balls MP Economic Secretary to the Treasury, raising my concerns. This is the responce he got back.... Quote: Ed Balls MP HM Treasury 1 Horse Guard Road London SW1A 2HQ Tony Wright MP 20 Church plain Great Yarmouth Norfolk NR30 1NE 16/09/06 Dear Tony Thank you for your letter of 1 August enclosing correspondence from your constituent XXXX about bank charges. I am replying as I have Ministerial responsibility for heis policy area. I am sorry to hear XXXX’s concerns about bank charges. The setting of charges and their application is a commercial decision for each individual bank. However, it is clearly important to customers and businesses are aware of the charges they face. The Banking Code sets standards of good banking practice for the banks and is the subject of independent review. The banking Code requires that signatories give their customers details of any charges for the day-to-day running of their accounts when they open it, that they inform their customers personally if they increase any of these charges or introduce a new charge and sets notice periods before changes are made to terms and conditions. The signatories are also required to tell customers the charge for any other service or product before they provide that service or product, and at any time the customer asks. With regard to the terms and conditions that set out these default charges, your constituent may be aware that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has been investigating credit card default charges. As a result of this investigation, the OFT wrote to leading banks in 2005 and argued that the bank’s credit card default charges were excessive, challenging the fairness based on existing rules set out in the “Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999”. The OFT have recently issued a further statement, setting out their views. The OFT recognize that there is a read across from credit cards to other default charges in consumer contracts such as bank overdrafts and mortgages. The OFT statement also contains immediate advice for consumers. It makes the position clear. In particular that while the OFT have set out their views that does not have the force of a court decision. Customers contemplating legal action need to take their own legal advice. In addition, all banks in the UK are required to follow prescribed complaints procedures for their customers. Unsatisfied customers are able to make a formal complaint to the bank concerned. Please pass on my thanks to XXXX for taking the trouble to make me aware of these concerns. Yours sincerely Ed Balls MP | Ok...not sure what to make of it....i'll leave it to you guys... |
| |
7th October 2006, 13:36
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Your MP 29 September 2006
Department of Trade and Industry
To: Alan Meale MP Re: Default and Penalty Charges Levied by Banks
Thank you for your letter dated 5 September to Gordon Brown, enclosing correspondence from your constituent, angeljen, about penalty and default charges levied by banks. I am replying as this matter falls within my portfolio.
I know the whole issue of default charges levied by financial institutions is something that has been attracting increasing attention over recent months. The Office of Fair Trading has been looking at the issue in the context of the level of default charges imposed by the eight leading credit card issuers in July last year to advise them of their provisional conclusion that they are not entitled to recover more in default charges than a reasonable pre-estimate of their costs in dealing with the default, and requested them to change their approach.
The OFT produced a statement of the principles they think card issuers should follow in order to set fair default charges. This is intended to protect consumers from being charged unfair amounts, but also to enable banks to compete vigorously and fairly. the banks were asked to confirm by 31 May their response to this statement and their willingness to make any necessary adjustments to their credit card default charges - the majority almost by half.
As a result of the subsequent reduction in charges across the market, the OFT is satisfied that no further intervention is warrented in this area at this time and that this change has bought about substantial benefits for consumers. The OFT remains of the view that the broad principles do read across to the retail banking area and has decided to undertake further work on the application of these principles to bank current accounts. The fact-finding exercise is expected to take up to March 2007, at which stage the OFT will consider whether a further detailed investigation of the fairness of individual bank default charges is needed.
RT. HON. IAN McCATNEY MP
Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs
__________________ Jen VS Barclays - £700 - SETTLED IN FULL Jen VS BarclayCard - £380 - SETTLED IN FULL + £132 EXTRA Jen VS Style RBOS - £245 - SETTLED AFTER SHERIFF OFFICERS WENT ROUND - REMOVING DEFAULT VIA Information Commissioners Office |
| |
12th October 2006, 12:37
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Your MP I wrote my letter to my MP, Derek Wyatt on 21st September & I have just received his reply today. Many thanks for your letter of 21 September regards this important issue. My apologies for the delay in responding but it arrived whilst I was at the Party Conference and, in the interim, I have been trying to secure an up-to-date profile for you regarding these charges. To that end, I have rung WHICH? - to establish whether progress is being made with their campaign, and with the matter in general. I am still waiting for the relevant person to call me back. Clearly, I share your concerns and those of the Consumer Action Group regarding bank and credit card charges. It is good to learn of Mr. Sawar MP's efforts, and I would be very happy if the CAG would like to know of my support. In the meantime, and because I was not fully up to speed with the current state of play, I asked our specialist Library for a briefing. I enclose a copy herewith, and trust it will be of assistance to you. I am taken aback to learn that the OFT failed to act on the relevant deadline. I have therefore tables a Parliamentary Question asking when the OFT recommendations will come into effect. As soon as I have the answer to hand, I will of course be in touch. He has attached Standard Note ref: SN/BT/3941 updated 26/6/2006 by Timothy Edmonds, Business & transport section. This document is 9 pages long, includes Bookworm's court bundle , BAG's legal argument & website, OFT announcement, Banks' response & Parliamentary activity. Also attached is Minister Presses 'Go' on Consumer Credit Act 2006 dated 25/5/2006 ref: P/2006/134. |
| |
26th October 2006, 21:46
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Your MP Still no reply from Alistair Darling, been waiting since August, I think another letter stating my unhappiness and if he doesn't pull his finger out I will not be voting for him, or do you think a letter to the local paper would be better. |
| | |