Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Campaign Are you interested in the bigger picture? Do you have definite ideas which you wish to contribute? Are you interested in campaigning in some way?
Whether it is bank charges, PPI, the cost of gas/electric/food/travel etc - this is the place to share your ideas. | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
6th October 2006, 14:58
|
#48 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group | Re: Your MP He has ask you if there is anything else he can do.
Tell him that you are in direct contact with the administrators of The Consumer Action Group. Tell him that you are aware that they have written to him by e-mail and that they are very disappointed that they have had no reply from him. They would very much like to hear from him. Tell him that The Consumer Action Group now has almost 80,000 registered users, that we are holding a rally outside the offices of the office of fair trading on the first of December at two o'clock in the afternoon and that BBC television news has already expressed an interest in coming along.
Tell him that The Consumer Action Group will have over 100,000 registered users by the time of the protest.
Tell him that The Consumer Action Group has a regular e-mail newsletter which reaches all 100,000 registered users and that we are informing them all which members of parliament are interested in supporting the bank charges issue and which of them may be attending the first of December protest.
Ask him if he is proposing to attend.
You can also tell him that you understand that Mohammed Sarwar MP has begun a campaign against bank charges in association with the trades union Unison and that The Consumer Action Group will be involved in it too.
Please let him know that if he would like to contact us -- or if he would invite asked to contact him we would be pleased to discuss the matter with him and also to pass on any message that he might have to our 100,000 registered users.
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
6th October 2006, 20:27
|
#49 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Your MP Quote: |
Originally Posted by Bookworm | Hey! That was posted after I asked!
I'll take credit for that idea!  |
| |
7th October 2006, 13:36
|
#50 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Your MP 29 September 2006
Department of Trade and Industry
To: Alan Meale MP Re: Default and Penalty Charges Levied by Banks
Thank you for your letter dated 5 September to Gordon Brown, enclosing correspondence from your constituent, angeljen, about penalty and default charges levied by banks. I am replying as this matter falls within my portfolio.
I know the whole issue of default charges levied by financial institutions is something that has been attracting increasing attention over recent months. The Office of Fair Trading has been looking at the issue in the context of the level of default charges imposed by the eight leading credit card issuers in July last year to advise them of their provisional conclusion that they are not entitled to recover more in default charges than a reasonable pre-estimate of their costs in dealing with the default, and requested them to change their approach.
The OFT produced a statement of the principles they think card issuers should follow in order to set fair default charges. This is intended to protect consumers from being charged unfair amounts, but also to enable banks to compete vigorously and fairly. the banks were asked to confirm by 31 May their response to this statement and their willingness to make any necessary adjustments to their credit card default charges - the majority almost by half.
As a result of the subsequent reduction in charges across the market, the OFT is satisfied that no further intervention is warrented in this area at this time and that this change has bought about substantial benefits for consumers. The OFT remains of the view that the broad principles do read across to the retail banking area and has decided to undertake further work on the application of these principles to bank current accounts. The fact-finding exercise is expected to take up to March 2007, at which stage the OFT will consider whether a further detailed investigation of the fairness of individual bank default charges is needed.
RT. HON. IAN McCATNEY MP
Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs
__________________ Jen VS Barclays - £700 - SETTLED IN FULL Jen VS BarclayCard - £380 - SETTLED IN FULL + £132 EXTRA Jen VS Style RBOS - £245 - SETTLED AFTER SHERIFF OFFICERS WENT ROUND - REMOVING DEFAULT VIA Information Commissioners Office |
| |
7th October 2006, 20:44
|
#53 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Your MP Hmmm, I wonder, if, in Scotland, Margo MacDoncald and oh what's the tan one in the news for claims about his sexual exploits: (can see his face, how could I forget this name?) would be prepared to lead something in the Scottish parliament and maybe shame some Westminster MPs into following suit?
I believe both referred to above are more ready to stand up and be counted while acting in the interest of their constituents than are they able to be pushed into towing the Party line by their fellow Party members. That old Scottish tenacity, which can be invaluable at times like this.
I'm telling you, Party Politics prohibit democracy.
Let's get party politics abolished. I'll start the thread if someone can tell me how to start a thread on here. I sent a mail to the webmaster wo replied directign me on how to do it but I am still lost.
Last edited by Vital Spark; 7th October 2006 at 20:50.
|
| |
7th October 2006, 23:23
|
#54 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Your MP Quote: |
Originally Posted by angeljen Should I send a follow up letter...? | Yes ask him how allowing the banks to continue to act unlawfully benefits the consumer & he shouldn't forget the electorate.
Tell him that if he does consider its OK then perhaps his opinion should be made available to a wider public on this & other websites so we can all take comfort in knowing he as a pillar of the establishment who like some of his colleagues sanctions such activity. |
| |
9th October 2006, 12:18
|
#56 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Your MP Follow up letter to My MP.. See what response this one gets Mr Jim McGovern House of Commons,
Westminster,
London. SW1A 0AA
Dear Jim, Thank you for your letter dated 5th October 2006 regarding Penalty charges issued by high street banks. Many members including the Administrators of the Consumer Action Group have already written directly to Alistair Darling regarding this matter, to date no one has had any reply from Mr Darling. The Consumer Action Group have in the region of 80,000 members and this number is rising daily, By December it is estimated that the membership will be in the region of 100,000. I myself am in direct contact with the Administrators of this website on an almost daily basis. I also understand that Mohammed Sarwar MP has begun a campaign against bank charges in association with the trades union Unison and that The Consumer Action Group will be involved in it too. Mohammed Sarwar MP has written directly to Gordon Brown on this matter. We have not seen any response to this letter as yet. The Consumer Action Group now has over 80,000 registered users. The Consumer Action Group are holding a rally outside the offices of the office of fair trading on the first of December 2006 at two o'clock in the afternoon. BBC television news have already expressed an interest in coming along to this rally. I intent to be present at that rally if at all possible. It would be good to see some of our MP’s attend this rally and offer their support. CONSUMER ACTION GROUP & PENALTY CHARGES FANCY DRESS RALLY When: 1 December 2006 at 2.00pm Where: Gather outside the OFT offices in Salisbury Square EC4 (nearest Network Rail Stations Blackfriars and City Thameslink). Click here for map The Consumer Action Group (www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk) and Penalty Charges (www.penaltycharges.co.uk) will be holding a peaceful protest against unfair and unlawful bank charges at 2.00pm on 1 December 2006 outside the Office of Fair Trading in London. The Government and OFT have repeatedly been asked to take action against banks and credit card providers who are unlawfully penalising their customers. So far they have failed to do so. For years the banks have been levying penalty charges at levels that, for many, create a vicious spiral of debt and poverty. These charges have the biggest impact on the poorest members of society some of whom see their benefit payments swallowed up by bank charges. Even worse, it is now apparent that these charges are set at levels that are clearly unlawful. The Consumer Action Group and Penalty Charges campaign were set up to help people fight back and recover these unlawful charges from their banks. So far 84,000 people have registered with the two websites and thousands of them have recovered millions of pounds in charges. The objective of both sites is to demand that the banks respect the rule of law and, if they fail to do so, for the Government and OFT to intervene to compel them. To help reach their objectives, they will be holding this rally to get the OFT to take action against the banks' unlawful activities. In order to demonstrate to the Government how serious the situation is, the rally will have the theme of 'A Christmas Carol' and members are asked to attend dressed as beggars - Bob Cratchitt, Tiny Tim, and generally poor people in rags - down and out people, to ensure the Office of Fair Trading understand the somber message that their failure to deal with this issue is leaving hundreds of thousands of people in poverty at Christmas and throughout the year. Members are also asked to wear masks to symbolise the hidden nature of unlawful bank charges. It is also now becoming more common for the courts to be applying stays to these claims until the results of a test case have been announced. As you are well aware this is playing right into the banks hands as they will always settle claims right at the last minute. It is really about time that the banks are made to stand up in court and account for their actions. Some cases are now being transferred away from the Small claims track to the the mercantile court in London The prospect of taking on a huge financial institution with a team of specilist lawyers is daunting in the extreme, however, I must stress that I believe in the justice of these cases and so have little choice but to bear the burden which could place myself and my family under huge financial and emotional distress. I would like to make my feelings clear at this time that the burden of any cost should ultimately be borne by the Office of Fair Trading, who have both the power and the resources needed to bring the necessary test case against the banks. Ian Reid | | |