consumer forums consumerforums Total Bank Charges Returned : £17,500,569 to 10384 people.

Bank Charges Refunds Survey | 'Buddy' System | Get an email address | Registration Problems | FAQ
The Consumer Forums  

CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right

These sales also help us to keep helping YOU and ensure this site will remain free to use!

Small Claims Kit-- Small Claims Court Guide
**New Edition**
Consumer Action Group envelope labels Last Will & Testament Kit Fight a Motoring Ticket
 
Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here


UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - click here: ConsumerWiki

Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide
An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.
£17.10 + £1 (P&P)

Lawpack - Small Claims Kit
Contains everything you need to sue your bank (or anyone else) including sample forms, instruction manual, templates, and an entire set of court forms in PDF format on CD Rom.
£10.99 + £1 (P&P)

Last Will and Testament Kit
Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.
£12.99 + £1 (P&P)

Fight a Motoring Ticket Kit
All the templates and documents that you need to challenge your speeding ticket, parking fine - with advice from one of the UK’s leading motor offence solicitors
£9.99 + £1 (P&P)


Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Consumer Action Group
> Campaign

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
eBay buyer?
Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Ebay buyer?
ConsumerSniper
Free unlimited bids and eBay tools
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
 

Campaign Are you interested in the bigger picture? Do you have definite ideas which you wish to contribute? Are you interested in campaigning in some way? Whether it is bank charges, PPI, the cost of gas/electric/food/travel etc - this is the place to share your ideas.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 27th July 2008, 16:36   #1 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
Default Campaign to the OFT against unfair CRA practices.

Can you look at my thread below.


EXPERIAN... The final battle commences

I think we may have hit upon a way to go after the CRA's. My proposal is to set up a sticky on the main page and get as many members as possible to send in a pre-formated letter of complaint to the OFT regarding the abuse of deafult notices. If we can get a large amount sent in it may consitute a mass complaint and get them acting.(the more the merrier) and get an ivestigation without an expensive court case.

A letter something like this...

Dear Sir/ Madam.

This letter is being sent to you as an official complaint against Experian Ltd, Equifax and Callcredit in their capacity as Credit Reference Agencies. The complaint also encompasses those companies who subscribe to the services of these Credit Reference Agencies. The complaint relates not to these companies handling of consumer data but to the uses that this data is put.

In particular I am concerned that ‘default’ markers on consumers accounts are being abused and used by these companies and their clients as a form of punishment against those who raise legitimate disputes with them. I believe that this is contrary to natural justice, OFT guidelines and possibly a violation of the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial under The Human Rights Act 1998

Currently a default marker is put onto a persons account after a default notice has been sent to them. The issue of these notices is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. These defaults are meant to be a pre-cursor to enforcement action through the County Courts. In effect they are a means to an end. They are a temp marker to allow other lenders to see that legal action is pending on an account. If the legal action is successful they are replaced by a County Court Judgement which is on view for 6 years. However it is apparent to me that these markers are being used when no enforcement action is been taken or has a prospect of being taken. This then renders these markers no longer a means to an end but an end in itself.
Instead of being used as a marker indicating pending legal action they are being used as an arbitrary punishment against consumers, imposed by an industry with no legal authority and no system of fair appeal. If a victim of these markers wishes to challenge these markers they are passed from one institution to another, given no reason why their claim is rejected and would have take legal action against the agency to have the marker removed. This can be both to expensive and stressful for most people.

The marker if placed on a record lasts for 6 years and has the same effect as a County Court Judgement. This affects a persons ability to gain credit, housing (landlord checks) and in some cases their ability to gain employment.

This seems to be an attempt by the Agencies and their clients to bypass the courts system and issue their own punishments against those who have genuine disputes.

I would request as a taxpayer and concerned consumer that the OFT investigate this situation as a matter of great urgency. I would be interested to know, and I am sure you would as well, how many of the millions of default markers issued over the last 6 years what percentage have resulted in any enforcement action being taken in court.

As a public body you have a duty to investigate any action that may be in breach of HRA1998 and I trust you will do so now


Yours truly,


any thoughts?
__________________
Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...st-unfair.html
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 16:49   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Account Customer
 
rippedoffagain's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Cagger since : Mar 2006
I am in: West Yorkshire
Posts: 814
rippedoffagain Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

This would seem to be a good idea, and I would certainly participate. May I also suggest that anyone who does write to the OFT also send a copy to their MP.
rippedoffagain is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 18:14   #3 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
eBay user? Find misspellings and zero-bid items

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

excellent idea
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 18:41   #4 (permalink)
Gold Account Customer
 
Hobbie's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Cagger since : Dec 2007
I am in: The Peoples Republic of England
Posts: 739
Hobbie InformativeHobbie Informative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Very good idea, I'll join in and send a letter, no problems about that.
Hobbie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 18:54   #5 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
eBay user? Find misspellings and zero-bid items

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

I recently challenged my council tax band... intresting that...it took 4 months. Why? because everyone was doing it after Martin lewis's program on it. Thats what the council said. If we could get the same amount of letters sent to the OFT then that may get them to act...... it's worth a try
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:03   #6 (permalink)
Platinum Account Customer
 
babybear39's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Cagger since : May 2007
I am in: Wales
Posts: 7,204
babybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritativebabybear39 Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Count me in...It's a few letters and may just make a difference
babybear39 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:03   #7 (permalink)
Platinum Account Customer
 
sosumi's Avatar
 
Our auction sniper is now live. Try it for free

Cagger since : Oct 2006
I am in: A cave in a mountain of paperwork!
Posts: 1,935
sosumi Highly informativesosumi Highly informativesosumi Highly informativesosumi Highly informativesosumi Highly informativesosumi Highly informative
Thumbs up Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Count me in!!
sosumi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:08   #8 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
We need funds
Please donate something

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Pending a decision on if we can get this thread a stcky if you are gonna send the letter or a letter just let me know here. Lets see how many we get.

let anyone else on here know if you can and give them the thread link. If we can get 2000 or so in the next month I think it may cause a stir...
I will be back on my other thread now (the one above)
....
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:09   #9 (permalink)
Basic Account Customer
 
Free trial on our eBay auction sniper

Cagger since : Jul 2008
Posts: 95
thecteam Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

im in for the longhaul. im sending this letter to the OFT nad one to my Local MP
will be sending 2 one from me one from the wife. will put a pile of letters in my shop for customers to send off.

Last edited by thecteam; 27th July 2008 at 19:20.
thecteam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:18   #10 (permalink)
Site Team
 
maroondevo52's Avatar
 
Give yourself a better chance with our claims guides and litigation kits

Cagger since : Jun 2006
I am in: Edinburgh
Posts: 8,585
maroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritativemaroondevo52 Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Hi,

I'll ask the site team members to have a look.


Regards.

Scott.
__________________
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.
If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.
Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

Bank of Scotland ( Business Account ) Small Claim.
Total: £1,027.70 Settled in Full.(October 2006)

Capital One Bank (Europe) plc Summary Cause Claim.
Total : £1,111,94: Settled in Full. (February 2007)

Bank of Scotland (Business Account) Summary Cause.
Total: £1,051.60. Settled in Full (April 2007)

Bank of Scotland (Business Account) FOS Claim.
Total: £4,945.00. Settled in Full (March 2008.
maroondevo52 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:32   #11 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
Free trial on our eBay auction sniper

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Cheers Scott
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:35   #12 (permalink)
Platinum Account Customer
 
banker_rhymes_with's Avatar
 
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here

Cagger since : Feb 2008
I am in: Debt :(
Posts: 2,889
banker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Hello Finlander!

I'm up for this, count me in.

Cheers,
BRW
banker_rhymes_with is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:36   #13 (permalink)
Site Team
 
pt2537's Avatar
 
Try our eBay sniping service

Cagger since : Jan 2007
I am in: Southampton (actually Eastleigh)
Posts: 11,670
pt2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritativept2537 Highly authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

just one fly in the ointment

the Human Rights Act 1998 does not give a right to an effective remedy, the Government left that clause out on purpose as they did not want the courts to have absolute power in deciding matters

apart from that the letter looks ok
__________________
Got an old Egg Agreement (Pre 2005) then have a look here

Next Directory troubles? a helping had to deal with them here

PLEASE DO NOT PRIVATE MESSAGE ME AND THEN WAIT FOR A REPLY, ESPECIALLY IF YOU NEED URGENT HELP AS YOU MAY NOT GET A REPLY IN TIME


pt2537 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:46   #14 (permalink)
Site Team
 
MARTIN3030's Avatar
 
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money?
Start your County Court claim NOW!!!

Cagger since : May 2006
I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 17,846
MARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

In principle looks ok.We could also do a block complaint which could be substantiated by individual cases should they request it.
The letter needs a little tidying.
Elsewhere on another thread it was asked who regulates CRAs.....the fact is that no one does and they operate as businesses with no specific criteria given to them under stat law.All the more reasons why they should be taken on-given that they will continue to play to their own rules until they are taken to task.
__________________
Halifax ; First one and very quick.
Royal Bank Scot; 1 done 1 ongoing
Telewest Broadband.......Won ..after 2 bounced cheques and them running out of time.
Barclays Business;.T.B.A
Citi Cards.Stayed;Full hearing listed June
Default removals;RBS 2 stay apps refused
Virgin media; 3 won.Now claiming damages for hostile action following last claim.
Cabot (Vanquis)Section 10 sent breach of CCA
Swinton Insurance-£12 default fees refunded
Retail Loss Prevention-assisting 6 victims.
Hillesden-Settlement agreed.

Have you got charges beyond 6 years ? Have your bank provided all statements ? Please take our survey.
The Consumer Forums - Data disclosure poll


Help us to help you-take time to read FAQs.





Please dont tip my scales-they have been broken for ages since my ex stood on them.







Advice offered by MARTIN3030 is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it.
You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt ie; Cobbett Ltd.

The writing here is deliberately made smaller-I thought Bookworm would not find any mistakes,but clearly did......after 28 months.!!
MARTIN3030 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 19:59   #15 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
Have we helped you? Please help us by making a donation

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

cool...I shall redraft and post below........
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 20:01   #16 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
eBay user? Find misspellings and zero-bid items

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Dear Sir/ Madam.

This letter is being sent to you as an official complaint against Experian Ltd, Equifax and Callcredit in their capacity as Credit Reference Agencies. The complaint also encompasses those companies who subscribe to the services of these Credit Reference Agencies. The complaint relates not to these companies handling of consumer data but to the uses that this data is put.


In particular I am concerned that ‘default’ markers on consumers accounts are being abused and used by these companies and their clients as a form of punishment against those who raise legitimate disputes with them. I believe that this is contrary to natural justice, OFT guidelines and possibly a violation of the right to a fair trial under The Human Rights Act 1998

Currently a default marker is put onto a persons account after a default notice has been sent to them. The issue of these notices is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. These defaults are meant to be a pre-cursor to enforcement action through the County Courts. In effect they are a means to an end. They are a temp marker to allow other lenders to see that legal action is pending on an account. If the legal action is successful they are replaced by a County Court Judgement which is on view for 6 years. However it is apparent to me that these markers are being used when no enforcement action is been taken or has a prospect of being taken. This then renders these markers no longer a means to an end but an end in itself.
Instead of being used as a marker indicating pending legal action they are being used as an arbitrary punishment against consumers, imposed by an industry with no legal authority and no system of fair appeal. If a victim of these markers wishes to challenge these markers they are passed from one institution to another, given no reason why their claim is rejected and would have take legal action against the agency to have the marker removed. This can be both to expensive and stressful for most people.

The marker if placed on a record lasts for 6 years and has the same effect as a County Court Judgement. This affects a persons ability to gain credit, housing (landlord checks) and in some cases their ability to gain employment.

This seems to be an attempt by the Agencies and their clients to bypass the courts system and issue their own punishments against those who have genuine disputes.

I would request as a taxpayer and concerned consumer that the OFT investigate this situation as a matter of great urgency. I would be interested to know, and I am sure you would as well, how many of the millions of default markers issued over the last 6 years what percentage have resulted in any enforcement action being taken in court.

As a public body you have a duty to investigate any action that may be in breach of HRA1998 and I trust you will do so now


Yours truly,


Effective remedy gone........
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 20:05   #17 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
Have we helped you? Please help us by making a donation

Cagger since : Jul 2007
Posts: 282
finlander Novitiatefinlander Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Martin... that all sounds great to me... As far as I can see..and believe me I have troied to think of every arguement.. unless the default marker is a temp marker it must be completely indefenceable to use it in the way it has been for so long.

No other industry, government body or institution has this power to destroy someones reputation without any recourse. I think a block complaint is a great idea and perhaps it is time we took the CRA's well out of there comfort zone.
finlander is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 20:10   #18 (permalink)
Site Team
 
MARTIN3030's Avatar
 
We need funds
Please donate something

Cagger since : May 2006
I am in: St.Helens Merseyside
Posts: 17,846
MARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 AuthoritativeMARTIN3030 Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

I would just like to clarify the points made by Paul which are correct.
This topic has been the subject of much debate in the past on these forums.I will have a look at some Archive stuff that I think may also be useful to consider.
__________________
Halifax ; First one and very quick.
Royal Bank Scot; 1 done 1 ongoing
Telewest Broadband.......Won ..after 2 bounced cheques and them running out of time.
Barclays Business;.T.B.A
Citi Cards.Stayed;Full hearing listed June
Default removals;RBS 2 stay apps refused
Virgin media; 3 won.Now claiming damages for hostile action following last claim.
Cabot (Vanquis)Section 10 sent breach of CCA
Swinton Insurance-£12 default fees refunded
Retail Loss Prevention-assisting 6 victims.
Hillesden-Settlement agreed.

Have you got charges beyond 6 years ? Have your bank provided all statements ? Please take our survey.
The Consumer Forums - Data disclosure poll


Help us to help you-take time to read FAQs.





Please dont tip my scales-they have been broken for ages since my ex stood on them.







Advice offered by MARTIN3030 is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it.
You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt ie; Cobbett Ltd.

The writing here is deliberately made smaller-I thought Bookworm would not find any mistakes,but clearly did......after 28 months.!!
MARTIN3030 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 20:17   #19 (permalink)
Classic Account Customer
 
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here

Cagger since : Apr 2007
Posts: 354
gill5blue Novitiate
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

HI All
very interesting I shall join too
gill5blue
gill5blue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2008, 21:03   #20 (permalink)
Platinum Account Customer
 
banker_rhymes_with's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Cagger since : Feb 2008
I am in: Debt :(
Posts: 2,889
banker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritativebanker_rhymes_with Authoritative
Default Re: Attn Of A Moderator Please

Hello Finlander!

Just a tweak of your Letter, feel free to ignore, dump or use any of the changes. Just trying to help get it into a hard hitting format that can be Printed Off by all Caggers and sent.

This is not intended to be a criticism! I welcome anyone to pull this apart and add whatever comments they feel are needed. My grammar is not perfect. I have used Capitals in places just for better effect, as this is intended to be a hard hitting Notice, rather than a standard Letter where normal rules of Grammar would apply. Think "Poster" rather than "Letter" in effect.

Quote:
Dear Sir/ Madam.

This letter is being sent to you as an Official Complaint against Experian Ltd, Equifax Plc and Callcredit Ltd in their capacity as Credit Reference Agencies. The Complaint also encompasses those Companies who subscribe to the services of these Credit Reference Agencies. The Complaint relates not to the handling of Consumers Data but to the uses that this Data is managed.

In particular, I am concerned that ‘Default’ markers on Consumer Accounts are being abused and manipulated by these Companies and their clients as a form of punishment against those who raise legitimate Disputes with them. I believe that this is contrary to natural justice,(please tell what is natural justice ?) the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) guidelines and possibly a violation of the right to a fair trial under The Human Rights Act 1998.(see Pauls post )

Currently, a Default marker is put onto a Consumer's Account after a Default Notice has been sent to them. The issue of these Notices is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. These Defaults are meant to be a pre-cursor to Enforcement Action through the County Courts. In effect, they are a means to an end.

In the Consumer Credit Act 1974, Parliament clearly intended these Defaults to be a temporary marker to allow other lenders to see that Legal Action is pending on an Account. If the Legal Action is successful then it was intended that the Default should be replaced by a County Court Judgement which is then on view for 6 years. However, it is apparant to me that these Default markers are being used when no Enforcement Action is being taken or has any likelyhood of being taken. This then renders these markers no longer a means to an end but an end in itself.

This is not how they were devised to be used.

Instead of being used as a marker indicating pending Legal Action they are being used as an arbitrary punishment against Consumers, imposed by an industry with no legal authority and no system of fair appeal. If a victim of these Defaults wishes to challenge these markers, then they are passed from one institution to another, given no reason why their claim is rejected (they will argue that they rely on information supplied by the creditor )and, utimately, can only seek redress by taking Legal Action themselves to have the marker removed. This is invariably too expensive and too stressful for almost all Consumers.

A Default marker, once placed on record, lasts for at least 6 years. Thus, the Default has exactly the same negative effect as a County Court Judgement,(not exactly) and yet requires neither a Court nor a Judgement.(same thing) This Adverse Data affects a Consumer's ability to gain Credit, Housing (Landlord Credit Checks) and, in some cases, their ability to gain employment (Employer Credit Checks).

This can be interpretated as an attempt by the Credit Reference Agencies and their clients to bypass the Court system and issue their own punishments against those who have genuine Disputes. In turn, the threat of a Default is also being used as a tool to try and deter those wishing to raise or discuss genuine Disputes.

I would request as a Taxpayer and concerned Consumer that the OFT investigate this situation as a matter of great urgency. I suggest that it would be productive to investigate what percentage of the millions of Default markers issued over the last 6 years, have actually resulted in any Enforcement action being taken in Court.

I feel that as a public body, you have a Duty to investigate any action that may be in breach of HRA1998 and I trust you will do so now.(again see Pauls post)
Updated 28/07/2008 00:06:

Many thanks MARTIN3030. All good points to discuss, and thanks for corrections (wish CAG had a spell check)!

WRT the: "requires neither a Court nor a Judgement"...I was trying a play on the County Court Judgement, i.e. to spell out that they are lumbering people without going to Court and without letting a Judge make a Judgement. If it doesn't read like that, then by all means pull it out.

Might be an idea to use Bullet Points perhaps?

Quote:
I'm fuming about this because:
  • It's just not English.
  • I hate banks.
  • No, I really hate banks
Then perhaps we can discuss the Bullet Points until we have a good hard hitting set, and then re-draft back into a Letter?

Cheers,
BRW

Last edited by banker_rhymes_with; 28th July 2008 at 00:13. Reason: still needs work but heres some adds
banker_rhymes_with is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter The Consumer Forums Replies Last Post
CCA, DCAs and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive babybear39 Debt Collection Industry 401 18th February 2009 21:01
LOWELLS Financial Services - Campaign against unfair policies of DCA's MrTWS Debt Collection Industry 314 19th August 2008 20:58
OFT Warns 13 Companies About Their Debt Collection Practices ukaviator Bank Charges and the Finance Industry in the media... 2 11th April 2008 11:23






Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE