consumer forums consumerforums Total Bank Charges Returned : £16595128 to 9717 people. The Consumer Forums  
Bank Charges Refunds Survey | 'Buddy' System | Get an email address | Site Map | Registration Problems | FAQ
CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right

These sales also help us to keep helping YOU and keeps this site free of third party adverts!

Small Claims Kit Small Claims Court Guide
**New Edition**
CallBurner - Skype
CallRecorder Review
Last Will & Testament Kit Fight a Motoring Ticket
 
Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here


UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - click here: ConsumerWiki

N.B. Please note - due to postage costs these products are only available in the U.K.



Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people.
Let your bank know that you won't give in.
Display one of our labels on your envelopes.
Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels
£3.50 inc p&p





Reclaim the Right!
The Lawpack Small Claims Kit contains everything you need to get your bank charges refund. Sample forms, Instruction manual, template forms and an entire set of court forms in .PDF format on CDRom.

Just type in the details of your claim and print them out.


Reclaim the Right!


Sue your bank as often as you like with one Lawpack!!

With a Lawpack and Patricia Pearl’s book on Small Claims, you have everything you need to get your unfair bank charges refunded or assert other consumer rights.
(England & Wales only)

CAG Forum Users Price £11.99
(click image to buy)
Plus £1 P&P



Reclaim the Right!


New Edition
Small Claims Procedure by Judge Patricia Pearl
An excellent guide for the layperson
Not for use in Scotland
Read BF's Review Here




Stand up to Telephone Harassment

If you use Skype -
Record your phone calls with CallBurner
It's Hot!

Click below to download your
14 day trial copy
CallBurner
Skype CallRecorder download


Read the
Explanation and review here
£31.96 - includes 20% CAG discount
(normally £39.95)

We've managed to negotiate a discount for CAG Users on DIY 'Willpacks'


Click on the image to purchase a Wills kit - £12.99 + £1.00 pp

Remember...you can't take your reclaimed bank charges with you ;-)



Do your Internet search here



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
Do your Internet search here:-

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
Bought an extended warranty?
Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Are you a victim of unfair trading?
Check it out
The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
Bank Action Group Debt Action Group
 

Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Bank Action Group - against unlawful bank charges
> The Bear Garden

The Bear Garden Had a bad day, Dear? Come here for some off-topic chat.


Welcome to The Consumer Action Group

and
The Bank Action Group


Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund. You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.

Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges.
We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 1st December 2007, 15:29   #1 (permalink)
littlesally
Gold Account Customer
Default Could Have!!

The correct wording is 'could/would/should have not of (i.e. could've)
Just wanted to point this out as it jars me.

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 15:38   #2 (permalink)
ukaviator
Site Team
 
ukaviator's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

Does it really annoy you that much Sally ? <Laffin>
ukaviator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 15:52   #3 (permalink)
littlesally
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: Could Have!!

I know it's silly UK, but yes it does - can't help it.
Also bugs me when my kids say ' the present what I would like' instead of that.
The school doesn't correct them, but I think it's important or they will sound thick!

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:01   #4 (permalink)
Michael Browne
Platinum Account Customer
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,628
Michael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne AuthoritativeMichael Browne Authoritative
Default Re: Could Have!!

http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/dro1199l.jpg
Michael Browne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:01   #5 (permalink)
Hippy-chick
Gold Account Customer
 
Hippy-chick's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

And - different to, when it should be different than or different from
Hippy-chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:26   #6 (permalink)
littlesally
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: Could Have!!

MB x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:32   #7 (permalink)
dave
Site Team
The Consumer Action Group
 
dave's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,729
dave has disabled reputation
Default Re: Could Have!!

I know exactly where you are coming from - it really gets my goat.

As does, "Loose" when the person means "Lose" (you see that a lot on here)

"To" instead of "Too" (as in "Too much", or "Me too")

Let the pendants revolt!
dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:36   #8 (permalink)
Hippy-chick
Gold Account Customer
 
Hippy-chick's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave View Post

As does, "Loose" when the person means "Lose" (you see that a lot on here)
I HATE that one.

I'm totally revolting at the moment - having just marked 70 essays from 1st year Uni students - I spend more time correcting grammar than commenting on arguments. Rant, Rant, Rant.

Grrrrrrrrrrr!

Thanks - I feel better now.

Hippy-chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:45   #9 (permalink)
littlesally
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: Could Have!!

There, their and they're!
I don't understand how they can be confused.
I can understand spelling things incorrectly but not writing/saying the wrong word.

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:48   #10 (permalink)
bazak1
Platinum Account Customer
 
bazak1's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

I know what you mean HC.
My kids say this quite regularly, "could of" instead of "could have".
No amount of correcting them seems to do the trick, because once they are back at school, it goes out of the window.
Another one that really riles me too is, the "F" being swapped for a "TH".
" i Fort i would go to the shops today".
" my mate naFan is coming over after"
When i went to school, the teachers would have kept us behind for ages until this "idle talking" was corrected.
What is the education system coming to?
bazak1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:51   #11 (permalink)
Hippy-chick
Gold Account Customer
 
Hippy-chick's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

Well Baz, it's so bad that we actually assess all our students online now and put as many as we can into classes to teach basic grammar. Most of them say they are not taught it at school. Most of them don't seem to want to learn it either ... And my department say I cannot mark down on grammar.

What's the education system coming to indeed!

Could of, of course, is a distortion on "could've"
Hippy-chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:55   #12 (permalink)
bazak1
Platinum Account Customer
 
bazak1's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

But where did it all change ?
Why has it been allowed to get so out of hand, and why havent young children had the basics of grammar drummed into them as we did years ago.
Reading, writing, maths, and good English understanding. The basics of any childs development in this country i would have thought.
bazak1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 16:58   #13 (permalink)
Hippy-chick
Gold Account Customer
 
Hippy-chick's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

Education policy. My sister's a head at a primary school - they have to teach the way they are told. Blame the stupid eejits who said that we should not be prescriptive about grammar. It's better in Scotland than England, I believe - and I think there's recently been a return to better methods in England.
Hippy-chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 17:00   #14 (permalink)
blueskies
Platinum Account Customer
 
blueskies's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

While we are in the pedantic mood. It bug me when people use apostrophes when they are pluralising a word.

Potato's etc.

Also I don't like Americanised spellings of words, such as all the words which end in 'ised', everyone seems to use the American 'ized' now (probably because the default dictionary for the computer spell checkers is US English).
blueskies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 17:03   #15 (permalink)
Hippy-chick
Gold Account Customer
 
Hippy-chick's Avatar
Default Re: Could Have!!

Oh, don't get me started on apostrophes bluey.

Or American English.
Hippy-chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 17:41   #16 (permalink)
littlesally
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: Could Have!!

My OH's kids say 'by purpose' instead of 'on purpose'. Their mum says 'on purpose' is wrong!

In Portsmouth they say 'I do's that'.

As for Americans - spit instead of spat? Wrong tense.

One of my friends refused to have her kids named with a TH in, as she thought it better if their dad could actually say their names.

Schools are the place for education, some parents are too lazy, uneducated or unintelligent to correct speech, but schools are meant to.
There is too much emphasis on correct clothing, not enough on speech.

Sally x
littlesally is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 17:41   #17 (permalink)
dave
Site Team
The Consumer Action Group
 
dave's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,729
dave has disabled reputation
Default Re: Could Have!!

You lot are just mean, they'res lot's of meanness in here.

After reading this, I need a few pint's.

dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2007, 17:43   #18 (permalink)
dave
Site Team
The Consumer Action Group
 
dave's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,729
dave has disabled reputation
Default Re: Could Have!!

Quote: