I'm new to this so am I right in joining this thread and reating it to my own problems ? Hope it's ok, so here goes.
Does anybody know what would happen if the judge in the first instance suggests that the filing of an
allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case ? How does this affect me ? Is there any action I need to take or do I just sit and wait ? I don't know if and when I should submit any additional data that may be helpful with the claim such as a revised Claim amount or detailed list of charges (explanation follows).
Barclays are defending my claim and have stated that 'The particulars of Claom do not provide details or particulars of the account in questiom and/or the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the dates thereof.' It then states that 'the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof or each charge and the date thereof.'
This is correct in that the draft version that I used, showing me what I should write, only required details on total amounts. However, the full details were submitted to Barclays when first advising of my intentions.
Lastly, the bank says I can't apply for charges made before 17th May 2001 as this is 6 years, however, my initial request, and calculations thereafter, were based on some charges slightly before this date but the delay in getting a reply and applying for action may have made some of these unclaimable. Does it matter that the amount that I am claiming may now have changed and therefore the amount I have asked fo could be wrong ?
In case it's relevant, the 'Notice of Transfer of Porceedings' was dated 27th June 2006.
For info, I have also started a seperate thread but this one seemed relevant to my case.
DW1963