| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Barclays, BCard and Woolwich successes **Existing Successful Claims Only *NO* New Threads Please** - Contact a moderator to move your thread |
13th June 2006, 17:29
|
#21 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: Mahala v Barclays Well done mahala
__________________ .. . Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. |
| |
20th June 2006, 12:04
|
#22 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Mahala v Barclays Barclays acknowledged the claim today. They now have until 17 July to file a defence.
Last edited by mahala; 20th June 2006 at 12:12.
|
| |
22nd June 2006, 12:12
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,729
| Re: Mahala v Barclays Apparently you can call him and he'll settle... so I've heard around here. Remember to ask if you can speak without prejudice... |
| |
29th July 2006, 08:36
|
#25 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Mahala v Barclays Barclays have entered their defence, and I am completing the allocation questionnaire now (it has to be erturned by Weds 2 August).
I don't know what to put in the "other information" area. Can someone tell me what I should write here? I've used the template to complete the rest, but this is the bit I need help with and it doesn't tell you what to put in there!
*breathe*
any help greatly appreciated. |
| |
30th July 2006, 17:09
|
#27 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mahala v Barclays OR!
You could add this:
As discussed on another thread;
If you have the N149, under section G (Other information) you should ask that the court orders Standard Disclosure
" I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe such an order would bring a rapid end to this litigation." The same can be entered in Section F of the N150.
It will not force the judge to order it - but no harm in trying.
I did it on mine, and took back my AQ on wednesday, so not far ahead of you. 
__________________ Barclays: Won ~ NatWest: Won ~ Halifax (x2): Won ~ FNMF: Won ~ Barclaycard: Won ~ GHD: Won ~ Grattan: Won ~ GE Money: Won ~ Capital One: Won ~ Land of Leather: Won. APRIL 2ND IS WORLD AUTISM AWARENESS DAY Advice & opinions given by Bookworm are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. |
| |
17th August 2006, 09:42
|
#30 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,729
| Re: Mahala v Barclays OK - on behalf of Mahala who's away, I can tell you that the Allocation Notice (allocating as expected to the small claims track) has arrived. Here's what it says; can you tell me if any of this means that "Standard Disclosure" has been ordered? Thanks!!
Hearing to take place on 2nd October @ 1400 Quote: |
Originally Posted by Notice of Allocation "Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any experts' report) on which he intends to rely at the hearing no later than 13 September 2006.
The original documents shall be brought to the hearing.
Witness statements shall be included in the documents served and filed. This includes the evidence of the parties themselves, and any other person whose evidence is to be relied upon, whether or not it is intended to call them at the hearing." | |
| |
17th August 2006, 14:30
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Jun 2006
Posts: 123
| Re: Mahala v Barclays Hi Mahala,
Are Barclays losing it?! Referring to their first reply to you. They initially said the statements would be supplied free of charge then at the end of the letter went on to say they will do it for £10 Are they now trying to recoup their losses or is someone out there very stressed?! |
| |
26th September 2006, 19:20
|
#32 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | I Won!! I received a letter from Barclays this morning. They still contend that I would lose the case if it should go to court, but taking into account the "small amount" of the claim and the time and money involved in going to court etc, etc.
They made me a full and final offer of £1088, which I have accepted. They originally tagged on a confidentiality agreement as a condition of the offer. I faxed an acceptance letter to Keith Jeremiah this afternoon, stating that I did not accept the confidentiality clause.
I've just had an email from him - they are prepared to forego that in order to bring a swift end to the case lol.
Cheque's in the post lol.
Just as well, we were going to court on Monday!
__________________ ... a little Mahala is a powerful thing ... If you like my advice, please click the scales.
All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice. Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed Simply Be: settled in full Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable. If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going. |
| |
26th September 2006, 20:52
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: Mahala v Barclays **WON** CONGRATULATIONS
__________________ .. . Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer. |
| |
28th September 2006, 13:34
|
#37 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Mahala v Barclays Quote: |
Originally Posted by StoneLaughter Apparently you can call him and he'll settle... so I've heard around here. Remember to ask if you can speak without prejudice... | Hi
I read your above quote with interest, I am waiting for a court date at the moment and whilst I am quite prepared to go to court, (it is just dragging on and on), do you think if I e-mailed keith jeremiah asking him if he is prepared to settle before court he may authorise settlement.
If so, how do you suggest I word my request???
Hope you can help.
J |
| |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | The Consumer Forums | Replies | Last Post | | Mahala v GE Capital | mahala | Other Institutions | 10 | 21st June 2006 17:43 | | Mahala v Abbey | mahala | Abbey Bank | 16 | 20th June 2006 19:23 |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|