| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Barclays, BCard and Woolwich successes **Existing Successful Claims Only *NO* New Threads Please** - Contact a moderator to move your thread |
13th February 2006, 19:22
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Jan 2006
Posts: 290
| Right to clear this up the people who are the 'customer services' for the bank can only go by what the organizations policies/procedures are, they are not knowingly lying to you, they are just doing their job.
Higher up in they fully know the leagalities, but until legislation is passed the banks will not change, when we see the first truely free banking service I reckon it will be so limited in use it will not be worth having. |
| |
14th February 2006, 16:04
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Administrator The Consumer Action Group | If they are going to close your account anyway, then you are in a good position.
Open an account somewhere else, then send them a letter stating that the charges are not enforcable and therefore neither is the overdraft that was a direct cause of their charges.
Accept their offer of £330, but inform them that you are going to go after them in the courts for the remainder if they do not pay up.
Tell them that if they wish to settle out of court at any time after the court proceedings have started then they will have to repair your credit file with ALL the agencies that they have effectivly defamed you with before you will even consider settling.
They will do as you ask eventually. Why should you be defamed and out of pocket because they do not comply with basic cotnract law? The simple answer is - you shouldn't. You are holding all the cards here - let them know it.
The money is yours - not theirs, so how can they legally force you to pay it and then 'penalise' you by closing the account? How can they register the 'debt' with a credit agency, when legally you do not owe them the money?
__________________ Advice & opinions of Dave and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. |
| |
15th February 2006, 18:58
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer | Thanx Dave for the advice will be writing to them shortly. As they are saying they will close my account anyway, may go all out and request statements to recover any other charges!
I have now opened another account but they are not offering me debit card due to information on credit file..... will let u know how it goes.  |
| |
15th February 2006, 19:14
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group | I gether from your opening post that your default postion was caused entirely by the bank's penalty charges.
If this is correct then as a condition of your settlement I should make it a requirement that they remove any entry they have made from the credit register. Do not aacept and amending entry.
This will very seriously test their will, I'm afraid - and your resolve too but clearing your good credit name is very important. If you stand your ground you can get what you want.
As to opening another classic current account with them, have you managed to do this already? or is it something which they have promised you.
I am sking because another User rported a simpar deal in respect of a mortgage. However, when he came to apply, the bank refused because of his credit scrore - despite the bank haveing blighted the credit score and despite their promise anyway.
Finally, you say that your account was a sole account and yet they are treating it as a joint account????
This sounds quite amazing and if it is entirely correct then it awards you an easy victory in every respect. But I have to ask, how come your ex was drawing from your account. What evidence does the bank have that you were operating the account as a partnership?
Also, if your ex was drawing from your account, have you thought about getting onto the Court Service and sending him the Good News within 14 days as well?
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
17th February 2006, 15:33
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group | I suggest that you should tend to keep all of the domestic complications of your story out of the equation altogether. It is completely irrelevant and only serves to make it look as if you were quite out of control and are trying to justify it in some way.
Don't clutter the story.
It was a sole account. You operated it soley and it was your sole responsibility which you accept. It ran into trouble which you were unable to control because of the accumulating effect of penalties which were applied despite their unenforceability at law. In the end the bank defaulted you because you were unable to pay them the unlawful penalties which they were demanding that you pay.
I understand that this is the story.
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
17th February 2006, 16:29
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group | You could use the template but it would have to be substantially amended. You realise of course that on receipt of your conditional acceptance that they will withdraw their offer. However, I think that you should not accept the money conditionally.
Point out that you will be pleased to accept their offer of £330 but that you intend to proceed for the outstanding balance if it is not received within the next 14 days. Furthermore if they should now decide to withdraw their partial offer that your action will be for the whole sum plus interest as 8% and continuing until the debt is paid.
Additionally as it is clear that they have made a default entry against your credit record you require also that this be entirely removed and confirmed in writing.
Furthermore that as they insist on describing your sole account as a joint account with your ex, you consider that their records are in dissarray and that you intend to make an immediate complaint to the ICA about this under the Data Protection Act as it is the bank's clear duty to make sure that the data they hold on you is accurate.
By the way, have you included a figure for any overdraft interest that they have deducted from you at the higher rate?
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
24th February 2006, 11:56
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2006 I am in: London
Posts: 444
| Just to let you know letter posted on 20th, no response yet. Have also now written to egg, similar scenario . ... |
| |
24th February 2006, 11:56
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2006 I am in: London
Posts: 444
| Just to let you know letter posted on 20th, no response yet. Have also now written to egg, similar scenario . ... |
| |
27th February 2006, 14:34
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2006
Posts: 61
| I'll be watching this one hotly. I had exactly the same with the Woolwich. £800 in charges by the time they had argued with me for a year. I asked them to remove the negative credit info and they refused as they said it was a "true reflection of the running of the account" It blatantly wasn't as it was their charges that put the account into a default situation.
I guess my next move will be to approach the information commissioner as my demands fell on deaf ears but please do come back and post if you get any luck.
Incidentally they told me they had shut my account and couldn't get it back. I told them that was rubbish when they invited me to re-apply as the online banking for it was still useable. I also said I would fail their own credit check due to their damage to my credit rating.
I think eventually they gave me my account back to shut me up and get rid of me! |
| |
1st March 2006, 10:51
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer | For all interested particularly Sportbeth REPLY RECEIVED Thank you for your letter dated 19 February 2006 concerning charges that have been applied to your account.
On reviewing your account I can confirm that all the charges are valid under our Terms and conditions of the Openplan Current Account. However, Whilst I am satisfied that the charges have been correctly applied, I am keen to resolve this matter as amicably as possible. Therefore, I am pleased to advise that I have today arranged for the sum of £ 313.12 to be reimbursed to your account, as a gesture of goodwill and in full and final settlementof your concerns.
I have been advised, by the Debt Management team that your account will be closed shortly. You will not be allowed to open another Openplan Current Account but will still be able to open a Woolwich classic current account.
With regards to your request to cleanse your credit file I apologise but I am unable to arrange this, as all the charges were all valid.
I offer my sincere apologies for my error in my previous letter explaining that as account is joint then joint liability. However I can confirm that this is and has always been a sole account.
I hope you feel that I have resolved your complaint satisfactorily........etc etc |
| |
1st March 2006, 11:11
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2006 I am in: London
Posts: 444
| Hi All as you can see reply received. So they have recredited account with remaining penalty . Still dissatisfied with refusal to remove default information from credit files. Also annoyed by the fact that they are suggesting to me that I may open another account with them....They know I will not be able to have debit card facility due to the information they have recorded against me.....
Feel I want to go after them now for penalty charges plus any interest lol since account opened. Would have to request statements for this.. Any advice for next stage gratefully accepted.....Most important for me to have them remove credit file entry |
| |
1st March 2006, 13:20
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group
Is your bank avoiding its debts Data disclosure poll Cagger since
: Jan 2006 I am in: Please consider making a donation if we have helped you. Thanks
Posts: 9,652
| I can see that we are going to end up in difficulty here not only with you but with others also.
the reason is that the banks are refunding money but not removing defaults and although this is a condition which you include in your correspondence, once they have repaid you the money, you are left merely with th epossiblity of going to court to seek an injucntion or a declaration.
these are possible but you do expose yourself to the danger of coming out of the small claims track and bearing a risk of costs.
You can believe me when I say that the banks really don't care about the money. They've got lots of it. They do care very very much about not restoring your credit reputation. They will go to extrordinary lengths to avoid this.
See my post on abuse by the banks ion the General section.
We need to have a think about what to do.
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
1st March 2006, 13:23
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Administrator The Consumer Action Group
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,438
| Why is this so important to them?
__________________ Advice & opinions of Dave and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. |
| |
1st March 2006, 15:10
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Quote: |
Originally Posted by BankFodder I can see that we are going to end up in difficulty here not only with you but with others also.
the reason is that the banks are refunding money but not removing defaults and although this is a condition which you include in your correspondence, once they have repaid you the money, you are left merely with th epossiblity of going to court to seek an injucntion or a declaration.
these are possible but you do expose yourself to the danger of coming out of the small claims track and bearing a risk of costs.
You can believe me when I say that the banks really don't care about the money. They've got lots of it. They do care very very much about not restoring your credit reputation. They will go to extrordinary lengths to avoid this.
See my post on abuse by the banks ion the General section.
We need to have a think about what to do. | How about serving a subject notice Under section 10 of the Data Protection Act (For deletion of inaccurate data) |
| |
1st March 2006, 17:42
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Site Team The Consumer Action Group | Yes but you will have to prove that it is innacurate, I am sure.
Having said that would you be kind enough to explain the s.10 procedure and what it requires.
__________________ Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me. Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts. |
| |
1st March 2006, 18:17
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer
Is your bank avoiding its debts Data disclosure poll Cagger since
: Feb 2006 I am in: Torquay, Devon
Posts: 180
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by BankFodder Yes but you will have to prove that it is innacurate, I am sure.
Having said that would you be kind enough to explain the s.10 procedure and what it requires. | http://www.ico.gov.uk/documentUpload...n%20I%20Do.pdf
if you click on the link it can explain far better than I can, From the I.C.O |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|