Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Hold the Front Page!! News updates The Consumer Forums front page Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Abbey and Cahoot successes **Existing Successful Claims Only *NO* New Threads Please** | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
9th July 2007, 10:37
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | kaz v cahoot***WON IN COURT*** hi everyone
im at the point of preparing my court bundle for my case against cahoot..
just read through an email i received from them and found this little gem..
quote:-
In any event we do not agree that the charges are disproportionate. The charges are reasonable and proportionate to the administative costs incurred by cahoot.
what i'd give for a statement like this from Lloyds in view of the recent cases where they have claimed the charges are not to cover costs and in fact are a service charge!
this guy possibly shot himself in the foot methinks!
karen
__________________ cap one - prelim letter sent 23/8 £460 owed partial refund, now sod off letter received 6/9 lba 5/10, claim served 30th jan, CAP ONE SETTLED IN FULL 15thTH FEB!!! lloyds card services - prelim sent 23/8 £332 owed sod off rerceived 25/9 lba 26/9 claim issued via mcol 13/10 awaiting papers from SC&M court date set for 26th March nat west - Data Protection Act sent 11/7.. non compliance.. considering court action. non compliance letter sent 29/8 giving them a further 7 days- gave them loads more days!! 5/10 lba sent for pre action disclosure settled in full 2.1.07 cahoot - Data Protection Act sent 7/8 on hold for a while Tesco - prelim sent 6/10 £200 owed |
| |
14th August 2007, 18:00
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot in view of the recent announcement of the "test case" had a letter from abbey saying they would be applying for a stay.. the court date is mon 20th aug, 6 days away! this morning i received a letter from the court saying the defence has been struck out and the case is still listed for monday!! what do i do now, please?!!!!
Last edited by karens25; 14th August 2007 at 18:04.
Reason: put wrong banks name .. der!!
|
| |
15th August 2007, 15:54
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot hi
thanks for the responses, gwildfire your case will be decided by now, im desperate to find out how you got on!
i am really nervous about going to court, i was thinking of ringing abbey to see if they want to make me an offer..
do i write to the court to ask for judgement in default? not sure what this actually means, does it mean i win by default or will i still have to put my case forward, sorry if being a bit thick!
thanks again
karen
Last edited by karens25; 15th August 2007 at 16:05.
|
| |
15th August 2007, 16:14
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot Karen,
I went to court, the hearing was vacated and a Judgment in default entered in my favour, the Judge I was informed is sick of being messed about! After he struck their defence he ruled, I had gone there, but I was told there was non need!
I have been told by the court to fill out an N225 form which activates a CCJ. Meaning that Abbey have to pay immediatley or I can issue a Warrant, in light of their behaviour it was also entered in to record that any request for a Stay in lue will be rejected without a good case.
So hopefully Karen you should be in the same boat as me! Good luck for monday, but I would ring them Thursday / Friday, and ask that
1. If a Skeleton argument has not been filled that the defence be struck out
2. If the defence has been struck out, request a judgement in default and request the hearing be vacated.
Let me know how you get on |
| |
17th August 2007, 18:44
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot hmm, I didnt even see the judge, if the defence has been stuck out, I would argue that their Barrister has no legal basis to be in court!
I made it to the reception where they sent me away!
I would also argue that any application for Stay should be denied.
The legal basis is that your case is unique, I would also point out that Cahoots terms and conditions differ from Abbeys, and Cahoot is not part of the test case. I would also argue that the test case will take a long time to satisfy and the high court case should not impead your legal right to proccess. I would also point out that Cahoot is unique in that they dont even send a letter, so infact their charges are even more disproportiante than their counterparts. I would also argue that, while the OFT has issued guidlines, it has no legal right to do so, banking is goverend by the banking code and the FSA not the OFT. The reccomendation to allow stays is not an inherent right of the bank and should be considered on its own merit.
I would also immedialty ask for the Barrister to removed from the hearing on the grounds that the defence has been stuck out and are not legally allowed to enter in to any defence argument or indeed actively participate in the hearing.
If you are introduced to the Barrister I would also tell him this before entering the hearing, no doubt they will send a psudo 21 year old snotty nose kid.
On entering the hearing immedialely ask for a Judgment in default on the grounds of a stuck out defence.
I would also post this in the main Abbey forum, as I have noticed this little Cahoot section gets overlooked.
The above was the legal arugment I had prepared, in the mean time I would read up on the UFCA and your court bundle and be prepared to answer questions.
There is a link in the main forum which courts are allowing stays and which are not.
Fingers crossed for you, dont wabble now, stick to your guns, the law is on your side. |
| |
17th August 2007, 20:15
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot thank you so much for the really useful advice, im hoping i dont get any further than the reception either! do you think they may be bluffing about the barrister, perhaps they havent applied for a stay already as i first thought? cos surely had they been refused they wouldn't be applying for one again! but still, that doesn't entitle the snotty barrister be party to the hearing, does it?!
i am feeling quite wobbly, im fine quoting all the stuff on here to friends and family, but i honestly never thought i'd end up in a courtroom, naive i know!
i do have in my evidence an email from them stating they have to charge these amounts to cover their administrative costs, perhaps i can focus on this, since they don't have any, as you point out!
sorry for going on and on.. nerves subsiding slightly now.. ish! thank you for all your help i really appreciate it..
will keep you posted
karen |
| |
21st August 2007, 00:42
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer
I am in: wADHURSRT EAST SUSSEX
Posts: 168
| Re: kaz v cahoot Hi desperate to know how you got on? |
| |
21st August 2007, 09:03
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot hi everyone.. I WON!!!!!!!!!!!!!
havin spent four days hardly sleeping or eating.. i attended court yesterday, they had 27 bank charge cases listed for 2 p.m!!
the barrister (actually quite a nice guy) introduced himself to me and said they would be asking for a stay i said, with all the confidence i could muster, "even though the defence has been struck out?" he looked visibly taken aback, said he wasn't aware of that and asked if i had the order stating that, i flipped through my file, confidence growing now, produced the order, and he disappeared into a room, called me in five minutes later, saying that this changed things quite a bit and they were now in a position to offer me everything i was asking for as a full and final settlement as he actually had no legal basis to be there, (thanks wildfire you were spot on!!) we had to go in to see the judge just to say we had agreed a settlement, the only faux pas i made whilst in the chambers was trying to sit on the same side of the table as the barrister!! oops!!
afterwards the barrister told us, off the record of course, they were being instructed not to contest any cases that stays weren't granted for, and judgement was given for every case there yesterday, no stays at all! although several of the banks had phoned in and settled that morning, we were told by the receptionist..
i would say to anyone with a hearing at chesterfield county court with district judge Butler, dont be nervous he is a lovely man, who apparently is red hot on bank charges, and he really looks after you!
have you got a court date boris?
thanks to everyone on here for all the very sound help and advice, could'nt have done it without you, donation on its way very soon!!!
good luck everyone
karen xx
p.s could one of the mods change my title to WON!!!!!!!! |
| |
21st August 2007, 19:38
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer
I am in: wADHURSRT EAST SUSSEX
Posts: 168
| Re: kaz v cahoot WELL DONE fanbloody tastic, yes I have a court case next wedneasday,. they havnt supplied a bundle and i am almost positive they wil go for a stay , how comes yours had been sruck out before? any advice? |
| |
22nd August 2007, 09:09
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: kaz v cahoot hiya becca(have read your thread!)
i wasn't told why the defence was struck out but i think it was because they failed to comply with the directions, (they didn't submit a bundle) i'm certain abbey will go for a stay too, and it will be down to the judge whether or not he grants it, if he doesn't i think they will make you an offer,
you seem very together about going to court, well done, i was a jibbering wreck!
just one thing, where they not told to disclose their true costs in the directions in your case, and if so, were they in the bundle?
good luck becca |
| | |