| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Notices | PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate | | Abbey Bank Meet other Abbey Bank customers who have also been faced with excessive unfair bank charges. Exchange encouragement and information about getting your bank charges refunded |
3rd June 2007, 21:40
|
#24 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 610
| Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! OK! Thanks for the warning!
If I should drop lucky and get another judgement by default I won't tell you, I'll keep posting here telling you what stage I'm at and then I won't have the additional expense of new windows!
I can't see it happening again...
But it's very strange that it's the same court, again I had my statements so didn't have to do Subject Access Request, and again no acknowledgement. I'll probably receive defence from Abbey next!
As I said, time will tell - I'll use the time to reinforce the windows! |
| |
6th June 2007, 12:00
|
#29 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Is your bank avoiding its debts Data disclosure poll Cagger since
: Apr 2007 I am in: staines
Posts: 794
| Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! Hi Knellyk, any news yet??? Asking cos im at same stage as u and wanted to know what happens after ive shot down the court, handed in my request for judgement and they still havent submitted defence?
Im gettting sooooooooooo excited and YOU'RE the one to ask (ive been told)
x bonnie x |
| |
9th June 2007, 19:38
|
#32 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! And today I received a copy of the defence that Abbey has sent to the court, this is the same as theone I received re my first claim, however it was accompanied by two copies of a letter offering 65% of my claim 'subject to your having received any refunds or goodwill payments in respect of the sums claimed'
Here's the letter in full... "Without Prejudice" Dear Knellyk YOURSELF -V- ABBEY NATIONAL PLC CLAIM NO: xxxxxxx 8 June 2007 We enclose by way of service a copy of the Defence that we have filed with the Court. The next stage in the process will be for the Court to send to each of us an Allocation Questionnaire, which asks for certain information relating to the case before it proceeds to trial. In the interim, we are writing to you to ascertain whether you would be prepared to agree to a settlement of your claim now in order to bring the matter to a close, limiting further expense to both of us and also avoiding the necessity of taking the further procedural steps such as the filing of Allocation Questionnaires. Regarding the charges, you will see from the Defence that Abbey takes issue with your claim on a number of points. For the purpose of this letter though, we should like to mention in particular that your claim seems to be based on an argument that you should not pay any charges at all. It cannot be correct that Abbey cannot charge anything at all if you become overdrawn or do not meet direct debits as Abbey must remedy the issues with the account and this incurs expense. This is in line with Banking Industry practice and the Terms and Conditions under which you opened the account. Even if it were correct (which is not accepted) that the charges are greater than Abbey's actual loss in dealing with your account, Abbey would still be entitled to charge you something for the expenses. Further, you will see the charges are liquidated damages, and not penalty charges and are therefore valid pre-estimates of loss. Your claim is for the refund of £xxxx.xx in bank charges and interest. As a matter of goodwill and without any admission of liability on Abbey's part, Abbey will offer to pay you 65% of your claim, that is, £xxxx.xx, subject to your having received any refunds or goodwill payments in respect of the sums claimed. This would be in full and final settlement of your claim. We hope that you will regard this as a reasonable offer in the circumstances and a genuine attempt to reach an amicable settlement of your claim. If you are prepared to agree to this please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter. We look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully it's Signed by ‘Abbey’ And they've added this for me to return!! I, Knellyk, accept your offer of settlement on the terms and conditions set out in this letter in full and final settlement of the Court Claim number ########. I confirm that upon receipt of payment of the settlement monies I will write to the Court and withdraw my claim. Date: Signed: Well, as the letter's without prejudice they can't use it in court to prove they've tried to settle, so I'll send them a reply telling them I understand I'll have to complete an Allocation Questionnaire and that I'm OK about it, I'll also tell them that I don't think I should pay nothing, I believe the charge is an unfair penalty and it's disproportionate with their actual costs, so if they disclose, and prove, their actual costs I'll be happy to pay that amount otherwise, they can pay me the lot back! (or words to that effect!) |
| |
10th June 2007, 00:54
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! Hey KnellyK! It looks as if claim number '2' is within days of being settled.  Good luck.
Andy |
| |
11th June 2007, 20:17
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 610
| Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! I've just been getting my response letter together and I see that the letter states 'Further, you will see the charges are liquidated damages, and not penalty charges and are therefore valid pre-estimates of loss. '
And I was wondering just exactly where or how I would see this, as the phrase 'liquidated damages' is not mentioned in the defence papers.
So, have I missed something or is this another Abbey confusion tactic? |
| |
14th June 2007, 17:34
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! Hi Knellyk, just popping my head in to say fingers crossed for u!!!!
xxxxxxxxxxx
bonnie |
| |
23rd June 2007, 13:09
|
#38 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! Use the abuse order now KnellyK. Send it as an attached document in Section G I think it is on N149. I had N150 to do so mine was section H.
You include the draft order, the abuse of process, list of settled cases to which you can add mine, Charley's and Clarions, the Hackney Judgement, Lincoln & Reading orders and an up to date schedule of charges.
Almost there now.  |
| |
23rd June 2007, 13:16
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! Hi Knellyk, As per advice from MJ, i went for the "Abuse Strike out" strategy like i think you r so on my AQ i included (Section H on N150)......Draft order for directions, List of Abbey Setted claims, 3 examples of Cases being struck out by the judge for abuse, Mullen v Hackney report and a letter advising the judge to Strike out the defence case for abuse of proces. (listen to me eh.. brainwashed)!!
You can find the list of whats required on Then new Allocation Questionnaire strategy or just yell for me!!!
Hope i have read yr thread correctly??
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| |
26th June 2007, 23:12
|
#40 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Your bank owes you an awful lot more money than you realise See here Cagger since
: Feb 2007
Posts: 610
| Re: knellyk 2 vs Abbey! I've heard nothing from Abbey and the deadline was yesterday, so today I took my Allocation questionnaire to the court!
I'll just wait around to see what happens next!! |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|